<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1055-7512</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3799</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Individual Employment Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWIE</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300324</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300324</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>7</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>1</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>1</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000007000119980101</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1998" Month="1" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 1 / 1998-99</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>HV6996WRAU9X</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=HV6996WRAU9X</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/X78A-8YT6-166D-VJYK</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>X78A8YT6166DVJYK</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>4</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Making Arbitration an Equitable Alternative to a Day in Court</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>49</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>60</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>X78A8YT6166DVJYK.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=X78A8YT6166DVJYK</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>1</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Bernadette</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>Marczely</FamilyName>
								<Degrees>Ed.D., J.D.</Degrees>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>David</GivenName>
								<Initials>W.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Marczely</FamilyName>
								<Degrees>Ph.D., J.D.</Degrees>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Cleveland State University, Ohio</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Cleveland Marshall College of Law, Ohio</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">Arbitration, long an important tool in settling labor disputes, is now being endorsed by the courts and the legislature as the panacea for settling employment disputes as well. However, this quasijudicial process, designed to resolve contractual disputes between organized labor and management, should not be presumed as equitable or effective a tool when used in its present form to settle employment disputes. This study analyzes the significant differences between labor and employment arbitration that must be addressed before employment arbitration can be a truly effective and equitable solution to the problems of the individual employee in the workplace.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
