10.2190/SH.4.1-2.h 33T61838K46M7UXJ 7 Are Mythopoetic Men's Support Groups Repackaged Patriarchy? 99 117 20080613 20080613 20080613 20080613 33T61838K46M7UXJ.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=33T61838K46M7UXJ 1 Edward Read Barton Michigan State University As a patriarchal society, the United States, along with much of the rest of the world, has established the male in a dominant role, with men socially conditioned to be providers, in control, and always to remain strong and manly. As a result of these socially constructed definitions of manhood, men have historically had to suppress their more tender feelings, leading sometimes to emotional isolation, alienation from their true feelings, and a feeling of powerlessness. Today men are finding the attributes of hegemonic, patriarchal masculinity untenable. Accordingly, men have begun to realize that they can take responsibility for their situations and change their lives if they so desire. Part of that change involves re-visioning, re-creating, and reconstructing healthier and less conflicted forms of masculine identity by making intentional choices to move out of the power and control cycle. As effective social remedies have been sought to help "men in crisis" (aside from therapeutic solutions), a highly, and increasingly successful intervention has proved to be participation in both self-help and mutual support groups. Mythopoetic men's peer mutual support groups are one setting where these reconstructions of masculine identity are occurring. This study focuses on the value of the mythopoetic branch of the contemporary men's movement as a rejection of patriarchal values, patriarchal masculinity, rather than just being another form of "repackaged" patriarchy.

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Barton, E. R. (Ed.). (2000a). Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others. Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Barton, E. R. (2000b). Parallels between mythopoetic men's work/men's peer mutual support groups and selected feminist theories. In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 3-20). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Barton, E. R. (2000c). Conclusion. In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 252-255). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Barton, E. R. (2003). A qualitative exploration of participation in men's peer mutual support groups: Beyond men hugging trees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Michigan State University.

Bilgere, D. (1997). Beyond the blame gage: Creating compassion and ending the sex war in your life. Madison, WI: MPC Press.

Bliss, S. (1992). What happened at a mythopoetic weekend? In C. Harding (Ed.), Wingspan: Inside the men's movement (pp. 95-99). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Bly, R. (1990). Iron John: A book about men. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Brandtstadter, J., & Lerner, R. M. (Eds.). (1999). Action & self-development: Theory and research through the life span. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Brannon, R. (1985). A scale for measuring attitudes about masculinity. In A. Sargent (Ed.), Beyond sex roles. St. Paul, MN: West.

Brod, H. (1992). The mythopoetic men's movement: A political critique. In C. Harding, (Ed.), Wingspan: Inside the men's movement (pp. 232-236). New York: St. Martin's Press.

Brown, L. S. (1992). Essential lies: A dystopian vision of the mythopoetic men's movement. In K. L. Hagen (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement (pp. 93-100). San Francisco, CA: Pandora.

Connell, R. W. (1987). Gender and power: Society, the person politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Eisler, R. (1990). The chalice and the blade. London, UK: Mandala.

Ellis, K. (1994). Who's afriad of Robert Bly? Feminism, gender politics, and the mainstream media. Masculinities, 2(1), 8-20.

Faludi, S. (1991). Backlash: The undeclared war against American women. New York: Crown.

Gilligan, C. (1993). In a different voice: Psychological theory and women's development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Hagen, K. L. (Ed.). (1992). Women respond to the men's movement. San Francisco, CA: Pandora.

Hollis, J. (1994). Under saturn's shadow: The wounding and healing of men. Toronto, ON: Inner City Books.

Irvine, L., & Klocke, B. (2001). Redefining men. Men and Masculinities, 4(1), 27-48.

Jesser, C. J. (1996). Fierce and tender men: Sociological aspects of the men's movement. Westport, CT: Praeger.

Kaufman, M. (1993). Cracking the armour: Power, pain and the lives of men. Toronto, ON: Viking.

Kaufman, M. (1994). Men, feminism, and men's contradictory experiences of power. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinities (pp. 142-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kimmel, M. S. (1995). The politics of manhood: Profeminist men respond to the mythopoetic men's movement (and the mythopoetic leaders answer). Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Kipnis, A. R. (1991). Knights without armor. Los Angeles, CA: Jeremy P. Tarcher.

Liebman, W. (1991). Tending the fire: The ritual men's group. St. Paul, MN: Ally Press.

Mankowski, E. S. (2000). Reconstructing masculinity: Role models in life stories of men's peer mutual support group members. In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 100-117). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Mankowski, E. S., Maton, K. I., Burke, C. K., Hoover, S. A., & Anderson, C. W. (2000). Collaborative research with a men's organization: Psychological, impact, functioning, and organizational growth. In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 184-203). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Moore, R. L. (2001). The archetype of initiation: Sacred space, ritual process, and personal transformation. M. J. Havlick (Ed.), Chicago, IL: Xlibris.

Morgan, D. H. J. (1994). Theater of war: Combat, the military, and masculinities. In H. Brod & M. Kaufman (Eds.), Theorizing masculinity (pp. 165-182). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Moyer, R. J. III (2004). The function of ritual in the mythopoetic men's movement: A self-in-relation approach. Unpublished clinical doctoral dissertation, California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University, San Diego, California.

New Warrior Network. (1996). The new warrior training adventure (brochure). Wendall, MA: Author.

O'Hanlon, B. (1999). Do one thing different: And other uncommonly sensible solutions to life's persistent problems. New York: Wm. Morrow & Co., Inc.

Pence, E., & Paymar, M. (1993). Education groups for men who batter: The Duluth model. New York: Springer.

Pentz, M. (2000). Heuristic and ethnographic study of the ManKind Project: Initiating men into a "New Masculinity" or a repackaging of dominant controlling patriarchy? In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 204-225). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Prochaska, J. O., Norcross, J. C., & DiClemente, C. C. (1994). Changing for good: The revolutionary program that explains the six stages of change and teaches you how to free yourself from bad habits. New York: Morrow.

Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The collapse and revival of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Real, T. (1997). I don't want to talk about it: Overcoming the secret legacy of male depression. New York: Scribner.

Richards, D. J. (2000). The therapeutic status of the mythopoetic approach: A psychological perspective. In E. R. Barton (Ed.), Mythopoetic perspectives of men's healing work: An anthology for therapists and others (pp. 157-179). Westport, CT: Bergin and Garvey.

Rowan, J. (1991). Four hills of vision: Working with men in groups. In J. Matthews (Ed.), Choirs of the gods: Revisioning masculinity (pp. 76-99). London, UK: Mandala.

Ruther, R. R. (1992). Patriarchy and the men's movement: Part of the problem or part of the solution. In K. L. Hagan (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement (pp. 13-18). San Francisco, CA: Pandora.

Schwalbe, M. (1996). Unlocking the iron cage: The men's movement, gender politics, and American culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

Starhawk. (1992). A men's movement I can trust. In K. L. Hagan (Ed.), Women respond to the men's movement (pp. 27-38). San Francisco, CA: Pandora.

Steinem, G. (1993). Revolution from within: A book of self-esteem. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Co.

Surrey, J. L. (1991). The relational self in women: Clinical implications. In J. V. Jordan, A. G. Kaplan, J. B. Miller, I. P. Stiver, & J. L. Surrey (Eds.), Women's growth in connection: Writings from the Stone Center (pp. 35-43). New York: Guilford Press.

Wuthnow, R. (1996). Sharing the journey: Support groups and America's new quest for community. New York: Free Press.