10.2190/SH.5.1.g W8278V051G3807M2 7 Cross-Cultural Gateway to Recovery: A Qualitative Study of Recovery Experiences in International AA Online Groups 73 104 20091215 20091215 20091215 20091215 W8278V051G3807M2.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=W8278V051G3807M2 1 Trond Nergaard Bjerke M. A., Ph.D. University Hospital of North Norway This ethnographic case-study explored people's use of online Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) groups with a global membership. The main objective was to explore AA members' preferences for using online AA groups, or not. Main queries were: Do participants use only online AA groups or both face-to-face and online groups? If they use only online groups, how do they explain their preference? If they use both, how do they view the online alternative? Finally, how do the AA members experience the global membership in the online groups? Can they identify with each other? The empirical basis for the discussion comprises data from participant observation in two international online AA groups for 1 year, involving content analysis of discussion threads, and a limited number of e-mail interviews. The result of the analysis is presented as a summary of what is gained from participation in online vs. F2F AA groups. The discussion of emerging themes suggests that online AA members can easily identify with each other despite their cultural differences. The majority of AA members in this study seem to prefer a combination of face-to-face and online AA groups. The plethora of AA resources on the Internet also seems to have provided AA members the opportunity to "customise" their recovery program and support network in a way that suits their particular needs and life situations, and in ways that transcend their native culture.

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). (1981). Twelve steps and twelve traditions. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). (1984). This is A. A. An introduction to the A. A. recovery program. AA Pamphlet. New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA). (2001). Alcoholics Anonymous (4th ed.). New York: Alcoholics Anonymous World Services, Inc.

Ben-Ari, A., & Azaiza, F. (1996). Minority group membership and perceptions of selfhelp: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 6, 131-140.

Borkman, T. (1990). Experiential, professional, and lay frames of reference. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Working with self-help (pp. 3-30). Silver Spring, MD: NASW Press.

Borkman, T. (1991). Introduction to the special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 643-649.

Borkman, T. (1997). A selective look at self-help groups in the United States. Health and Social Care in the Community, 5(6), 357-364.

Borkman, T. (1999). Understanding self-help/mutual aid: Experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

Burrows, R., Nettleton, S., Pleace, N., Loader, B., & Muncer, S. (2000). Virtual Community Care? Social policy and the emergence of computer mediated social support. Information, Communication & Society, 3(1), 95-121.

Cain, C. (1991). Personal stories, identity acquisition and self-understanding in Alcoholics Anonymous. Ethos, 19, 210-253.

Denzin, N. K. (1987). The alcoholic society: Addiction and recovery of the self. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

Denzin, N. K. (1998). The art and politics of interpretation. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 313-344). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Eisenbach-Stangl, I., & Rosenqvist, P. (Eds.). (1998). Diversity in unity: Studies of Alcoholic Anonymous in eight societies [No. 33]. Helsingfors, Finland: Nordic Council for Alcohol and Drug Research.

Erlandson D. A., Harris E. L., Skipper B. L., & Allen S. D. (1993). Doing naturalistic inquiry: A guide to methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Eysenbach, G., Powell, J., Englesakis, M., Rizo, C., & Stern, A. (2004). Health related virtual communities and electronic support groups: Systematic review of the effects of online peer to peer interactions, British Medical Journal, 328, 1166-1171.

Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Book.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Oxford: Polity.

Hardey, M. (1999). Doctor in the house: The Internet as a source of lay health knowledge and the challenge of expertise. Sociology of Health and Illness, 21(6), 820-835.

Houston, T. K., Cooper, L. A., & Ford, D. E. (2002). Internet support groups for depression: A 1 year prospective cohort study. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 2062-2068.

Humphreys, K. (2000). Community narratives and personal stories in Alcoholic Anonymous. Journal of Community Psychology, 28(5), 495-506.

Humphreys, K. (2004). Circles of recovery: Self-help organizations for addictions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Humphreys, K., & Rappaport, J. (1994). Researching self-help/mutual aid groups and organizations: Many roads, one journey. Applied & Preventive Psychology, 3, 217-231.

James, N., & Busher, H. (2006). Credibility, authenticity and voice: Dilemmas in online interviewing. Qualitative Research, 6(3), 403-420.

Johnsen, J.-A. K. (2008). Electronically mediated health communication: Uses of textbased media. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Tromsø, Norway.

Jones, S. (Ed.). (1999). Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kennedy, M., & Humphreys, K. (1994). Understanding worldview transformation in members of mutual help groups. Prevention in Human Services, 11, 181-198.

Kennedy, M., Humphreys, K., & Borkman, T. (1994). Naturalistic paradigm as an alternative approach to research with self-help groups. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding self-help organizations: Frameworks and findings (pp. 172-189). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computermediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.

King, S. A. (1994). Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts. Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 2(3), 47-56.

King, S. A., & Moreggi, D. (1998). Internet therapy and self-help groups: The pros and cons. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications (pp. 77-109). New York: Academic Press.

Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V. Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being. American Psychology, 53(9), 1017-1031.

Kummervold, P. E., Gammon, D., Bergvik, S., Johnsen, J.-A. K., Hasvold, T., & Rosenvinge, J. H. (2002). Social support in a wired world—Use of mental health discussion forums in Norway. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 56, 59-65.

Lieberman, M. A., & Humphreys, K. (2002). Self-help groups in substance abuse: An examination of AA. In D. W. Brook & H. I. Spitz (Eds.), The group psycho therapy of substance abuse (pp. 203-224). Binghamton, NY: The Haworth Press, Inc.

Lieberman, M. A., & Russo, S. (2001). Self-help groups and the Internet: Breast cancer newsgroup. International Journal of Self Help & Self Care, 1(4), 323-344.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Madara, E. J. (1998). Perspectives—Vol. 3, No. 2—The Mutual-Aid Self-Help Online Revolution. Retrieved June 12, 2008, from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=359'>http://www.mentalhelp.net/poc/view_doc.php?type=doc&id=359</a>

Madara, E. J. (1999). From church basements to World Wide Web sites: The growth of self-help support groups online. International Journal of Self-Help & Self-Care, 1(1), 37-48.

Mäkelä, K., Arminen, I., Bloomfield, K., Eisenbach-Stangl, I., Bergmark, K. H., Kurube, N., et al. (1996). Alcoholic Anonymous as a mutual-help movement: A study in eight societies. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.

Mann, C., & Stewart, F. (2000). Internet communication and qualitative research: A handbook for researching online. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Mann, C., & Steward, F. (2004). Introducing online methods. In S. N. Hesse-Biber & P. Leavy (Eds.), Approaches to qualitative research: A reader on theory and practice (pp. 367-401). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Markham, A. N. (2006). The Internet as research context. In C. Seal, G. Gobo, J. F. Gubrium, & D. Silverman (Eds.), Qualitative research practice (pp. 328-344). London: Sage.

Markham, A. N. (2008). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnograph. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 247-284). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

McKenna, K. Y. A., & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57-75.

Miller, M. W. (1997). Cancer support groups migrate to Internet Relay Chat. Health Care on the Internet, 1, 83-89.

Munn-Giddings, C., & Borkman, T. (2005). Self-help/mutual aid as a psychosocial phenomenon. In S. Ramon & J. E. Williams (Eds.), Mental health at the crossroads. The promise of the psychosocial approach (pp. 137-155). Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing Company.

Parks, M. R., & Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Communication, 46, 80-97.

Phillips, W. (1996). A comparison of online, e-mail, and in-person self-help groups using adult children of alcoholics as a model. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from <a target="_blank" href='http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/acoa.htm'>http://www-usr.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/acoa.htm</a>

Powell, T. J. (Ed.). (1994). Understanding self-help organizations: Frameworks and findings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Rappaport, J. (1994). Narrative studies, personal stories, and identity transformation in the mutual-help context. In T. J. Powell (Ed.), Understanding the self-help organization (pp. 115-135). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Salem, D. A., Bogat, G. A., & Reid, C. (1997). Mutual help goes online. Journal of Community Psychology, 25(2), 189-207.

Seymour, W. S. (2001). In the flesh or online? Exploring qualitative research methodologies. Qualitative Research, 1(2): 147-168.

Sharf, B. F. (1999). Beyond Netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In S. Jones (Ed.), Doing Internet research: Critical issues and methods for examining the Net (pp. 243-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Smith, M. A., & Leigh, B. (1997). Virtual subjects: Using the Internet as an alternative source of subjects and research environment. Behaviour Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4), 496-505.

Tenni, C., Smyth, A., & Boucher, C. (2003). The researcher as autobiographer: Analysing data written about oneself. The Qualitative Report, 8. Retrieved October 20, 2008, from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/tenni.html <a target="_blank" href='http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/tenni.html'>http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-1/tenni.html</a>

VanLear C. A., Sheehan M., Withers L. A., & Walker R. A. (2005). AA Online: The enactment of supportive computer mediated communication. Western Journal of Communication, 69, 5-26.

Weinberg, N., Schmale, J., Uken, J., & Wessel, K. (1996). Online help: Cancer patients participate in a computer mediated support group. Health & Social Work, 21(1), 24-29.

White, M., & Dorman, S. M. (2001). Receiving social support online: Implications for health education. Health Education Research, 16(6), 693-707.

Winzelberg, A. J., Classen, C., Alpers, G. W., Roberts, H., Koopman, C., Adams, R. E., et al. (2003). Evaluation of an Internet support group for women with primary breast cancer. American Cancer Society, 97(5), 1164-1173.