<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1938-4998</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1938-5005</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Workplace Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWWR</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>121043</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=121043</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>13</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>1</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>1</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000013000120080101</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2008" Month="1" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 1 / 2008</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>QR7650U89329</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=QR7650U89329</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/WR.13.1.d</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>M5J6L45481448342</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>4</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Peer Review in Employment Disputes: An Employee Right or an Employee Wrong?</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>41</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>58</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20080407</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20080407</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20080407</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20080407</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>M5J6L45481448342.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=M5J6L45481448342</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>1</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Tanya</GivenName>
								<Initials>M.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Marcum</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>Elizabeth</GivenName>
								<Initials>A.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Campbell</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Bradley University</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Central Michigan University</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">One of the boldest initiatives in the legal field in the last few decades has been the increased use of alternative dispute resolution methods to resolve employment disputes. Judicial enforcement of arbitration and other forms of alternative dispute resolution methods have been imposed on all facets of business and domestic activities. In the employment arena, especially in nonunionized settings where employees do not enjoy the benefits of collective representation, the search for mechanisms to achieve the resolution of employment disputes has resulted in innovative techniques and processes. This article will focus narrowly on the use of peer review, a type of dispute resolution in the employment arena where the panel consists of coemployees who are peers of the very employee involved in a dispute with the employer. Many legal issues are raised concerning this form of alternative dispute resolution process, and this article will examine each of them, as well as the risks and benefits inherent in the employee's use of peer review processes to resolve employment disputes.</Abstract>
						<biblist>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="1">&lt;i&gt;Alexander v. Gardner-Denver Co.&lt;/i&gt; 1974. 415 U.S. 36.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="2">Association for Conflict Resolution. 2003. &lt;i&gt;Frequently asked questions about conflict resolution.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved January 31, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.acrnet.org/about/CR-FAQ.htm'&gt;www.acrnet.org/about/CR-FAQ.htm&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="3">&lt;i&gt;Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams.&lt;/i&gt; 2001. 532 U.S. 105.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="4">&lt;i&gt;Circuit City Stores, Inc. v. Adams.&lt;/i&gt; 2002. 279 F. 3d 889 (N.D. California).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="5">&lt;i&gt;Cole v. Burns International Security Services.&lt;/i&gt; 1997. 105 F. 3d 1465 (D.C.).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="6">Department of Health and Human Services. 2003. &lt;i&gt;The Alternative Dispute Resolution Division.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved January 31, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.os.dhhs.gov/dab/adr/'&gt;www.os.dhhs.gov/dab/adr/&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="7">Department of Labor. 1994. &lt;i&gt;The Dunlop Commission on the future of worker-management relations: Report and recommendations.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved February 12, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/2/'&gt;http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/2/&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="8">Department of the Army. 2007. &lt;i&gt;Army alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved January 31, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.hqda.army.mil/ogc/referenc/adr.htm'&gt;www.hqda.army.mil/ogc/referenc/adr.htm&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="9">&lt;i&gt;Electromation v. NLRB.&lt;/i&gt; 1994. 35 F. 3d 1148 (7th Circuit).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="10">Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2003. &lt;i&gt;Peer review.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved January 31, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.eeoc.gov/federal/adr/peerreview.html'&gt;www.eeoc.gov/federal/adr/peerreview.html&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="11">&lt;i&gt;Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.&lt;/i&gt; 1991. 500 U.S. 20.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="12">Green, M. Z. 2000. Debunking the myth of employer advantage from using mandatory arbitration from discrimination claims. &lt;i&gt;Rutgers Law Journal&lt;/i&gt;, 31: 399-471.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="13">Hillman A. J., &amp; Rynes S. L. 2007. The future of double-blind review in management. &lt;i&gt;Journal of Management Studies&lt;/i&gt;, 44: 622-627.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="14">&lt;i&gt;Hooters v. Phillips.&lt;/i&gt; 1999. 173 F. 3d 933 (South Carolina).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="15">Jacobs, M. A. 1998. Red Lobster tale: Peers decide fired waitress's fate. &lt;i&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/i&gt;, January 20: B1.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="16">&lt;i&gt;Kansas State University.&lt;/i&gt; 2006. &lt;i&gt;Policies and procedures manual.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved January 31, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.K-state.edu/policies/ppm/4030.html'&gt;www.K-state.edu/policies/ppm/4030.html&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="17">&lt;i&gt;Keeler Brass Automotive Group.&lt;/i&gt; 1995. 317 N.L.R.B. 1110.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="18">LeRoy, M. H., &amp; Feuille, P. 2007. As the enterprise wheel turns: New evidence on the finality of labor arbitration awards. &lt;i&gt;Stanford Law and Policy Review&lt;/i&gt;, 18: 191-233.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="19">&lt;i&gt;McMullen v. Meijer.&lt;/i&gt; 2004. 355 F. 3d 485.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="20">National Transportation Safety Board. 2007. &lt;i&gt;Information quality guidelines.&lt;/i&gt; Retrieved February 11, 2008, from &lt;a target=&quot;_blank&quot; href='http://www.ntsb.gov/Info/quality_reports/fy07_guidelines.htm'&gt;www.ntsb.gov/Info/quality_reports/fy07_guidelines.htm&lt;/a&gt;</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="21">&lt;i&gt;NLRB v. Webcor Packaging, Inc.&lt;/i&gt; 1997. 118 F. 3d 115 (E.D. Michigan)</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="22">&lt;i&gt;NLRB v. Yeshiva University.&lt;/i&gt; 1980. 444 U.S. 672.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="23">&lt;i&gt;Renny v. Port Huron Hospital.&lt;/i&gt; 1986. 427 Mich. 415.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="24">&lt;i&gt;Sparks Nugget, Inc.&lt;/i&gt; 1977. 230 N.L.R.B. 275.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="25">&lt;i&gt;Thornsberry v. North Star Steel Co.&lt;/i&gt; 1991. US Dist. LEXIS 16488, 125 Lab. Cas. (CCH)P57,427 (E.D. Michigan).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="26">&lt;i&gt;Toussaint v. Blue Cross.&lt;/i&gt; 1980. 408 Mich. 579.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="27">&lt;i&gt;Walker v. Ryan's Family Steak House.&lt;/i&gt; 2003. 289 F. Supp. 2d 916 (M.D. Tennessee).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="28">&lt;i&gt;Walker v. Ryan's Family Steak House.&lt;/i&gt; 2005. 400 F. 3d 370 (M.D. Tennessee).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="29">Walsh. D. J. 2004. &lt;i&gt;Employment law for human resource practice.&lt;/i&gt; Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="30">Wheeler H. N., Klass B. S., &amp; Mahony D. M. 2004. &lt;i&gt;Workplace justice without unions.&lt;/i&gt; Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
						</biblist>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
