10.2190/WR.13.4.d 21902JM205512220 4 "We Thought We Were Going to Get It Done": Examining the Paid Family Leave Campaign in Massachusetts 401 419 20091119 20091119 20091119 20091119 21902JM205512220.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=21902JM205512220 4 Lori Gardinier Human Services Program Boston, Northeastern University, Massachusetts This case study identifies the factors that promoted the mobilization and de-escalation of the paid family leave campaign in Massachusetts from 1998 to 2002. These factors are compared against those involved in the California campaign that resulted in the successful passage of legislation. The present article provides a unique exploration of paid family leave organizing and reveals the problems that are specific to mobilization for this issue. This research is significant to social movement research and policy studies because it highlights the elements, processes, and resources that influence and foster meaningful and effective coalition building, and the relationships between mobilization groups and larger systems. This case study applies interview, documentary and economic indicators. The primary conclusion is that intertwined economic, political, and organizational factors coupled with proposed policy components impeded success in Massachusetts and that the factors and policy in Massachusetts differed from the conditions and policy proposals in California.

Andrews, K. T., & Edwards, B. 2004. Advocacy organizations in the U.S. political process. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 479-506.

Broder, J. 2002. Family Leave in California Now Includes Pay Benefit. New York Times, September 24.

Cail, J., & Wang, T. 2008. Sexuality and transgender issues in employment law. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law, 9: 855-879.

Cantor, D., Waldfogel, J., Kerwin, J., Wright, M. M., Levin, K., Rauch, J., Hagerty, T., & Kudela, M. S. 2001. Balancing the needs of families and employers: Family and medical leave surveys. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.dol.gov/asp/archive/reports/fmla/toc.htm'>www.dol.gov/asp/archive/reports/fmla/toc.htm</a>

Collins, J. W. 2003. The political economy of state-level fair employment laws, 1940-1964. Explorations in Economic History, 40: 24-51.

Cress, D., & Snow, D. 2000. The outcomes of homeless mobilization: The influence of organization, disruption, political mediation, and framing. American Journal of Sociology, 105: 1063-1104.

Dube, A., & Kaplan, E. 2002. Paid family leave in California: An analysis of costs and benefits. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/healthcare/dube_kaplan_pfl02.pdf'>http://laborcenter.berkeley.edu/healthcare/dube_kaplan_pfl02.pdf</a>

Fuchs, S., & Plass, P. S. 1999. Sociology and social movements. Contemporary Sociology, 28: 271-77.

Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

Gubrium, J., & Holstein, J. 2001. Handbook of interview research: Context and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Institute for Women's Policy Research. 2007. Maternity leave in the United States. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/parentalleaveA131.pdf'>http://www.iwpr.org/pdf/parentalleaveA131.pdf</a>

Jenkins, J. C. 1983. Resource mobilization theory and the study of social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 9: 527-553.

Kingdon, J. 1995. Agenda, alternatives and public policies. New York: Harper Collins.

Labor Project for Working Families. 2003. Putting families first: How California won the fight for paid leave. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.working-families.org/organize/pdf/paidleavewon.pdf'>www.working-families.org/organize/pdf/paidleavewon.pdf</a>

Milkman, R., & Appelbaum, E. 2004. Paid family leave in California: New research findings. The State of California Labor, 4: 45-67.

Oliver, P. E. 1993. Formal models of collective action. Annual Review of Sociology, 19: 271-300

Sherman, E. 2001. Gender politics in Massachusetts: Progress for paid leave. New England Journal of Public Policy, 17: 59-80

Tarrow, S. 1998. Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Taylor, V. 2000. Mobilizing for change in a social movement society. Contemporary Sociology, 29: 219-230.

U.S. Commission on Family and Medical Leave. 1996. A workable balance: Report to Congress on family and medical leave policies. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/1/'>http://digitalcommons.ilr.cornell.edu/key_workplace/1/</a>

U.S. Department of Labor. 2008. The Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993: Final rule. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.dol.gov/federalregister/HtmlDisplay.aspx?DocId=21763&Month=11&Year=2008'>http://www.dol.gov/federalregister/HtmlDisplay.aspx?DocId=21763&Month=11&Year=2008</a>

White House. 2009. Issues: Civil rights. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/CIVIL_RIGHTS/'>http://www.whitehouse.gov/issues/CIVIL_RIGHTS/</a>

Wisensale, S. 2003. Two steps forward, one step back: The Family and Medical Leave Act as retrenchment policy. Review of Policy Research, 20: 135-151.

Yelen, C. 2002. Home and away: The politics and policy of family leave in Massachusetts. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.hks.harvard.edu/rappaport/downloads/homeandaway.pdf'>www.hks.harvard.edu/rappaport/downloads/homeandaway.pdf</a>

Zahariadis, N. 1998. Comparing three lenses of policy choice. Policy Studies Journal, 26: 434-448.