10.2190/WR.14.1.c 7482531311136871 3 Control as Colonialism: Workplace Democracy and the Transfer of Managerial Practices within Multinational Corporations 27 48 20100527 20100527 20100527 20100527 7482531311136871.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=7482531311136871 1 Diana Rosemary Sharpe Raza Mir Webster Graduate School, Regents College, London, United Kingdom William Paterson University, Wayne, New Jersey In this article, we draw upon extensive empirical research conducted at the UK subsidiary of a Japanese multinational corporation to foreground the tension between organizational productivity and worker autonomy, and between firm efficiency and workplace democracy. We use insights from studies of colonialism to illuminate different facets of this contested terrain. We argue that in the interaction between the gaze with which top management fixes the lower echelons of the corporation in time and space, and management's occasional attempts to embrace the lower echelons in a web of common purpose, the gaze inevitably wins. However, worker resistance is forever present, if ill-understood by mainstream organizational researchers. Our perspective helps us link microanalyses of the organizational control process to underlying institutional structures, and brings worker resistance and its minor victories to the forefront. This approach is especially important to researchers who are interested in bringing issues of workplace democracy to the forefront of organizational theory.

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. The dialogic imagination: Four essays. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bhabha, H. 1994. The location of culture. London: Routledge.

Bhaskar, R. 1979. The possibilities of naturalism: A philosophical critique of the contemporary human sciences. London: Routledge.

Chakrabarty, D. 1989. Rethinking working-class history: Bengal 1890-1940. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Chatterjee, P. 2005. The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New Delhi, India: Permanent Black.

Cole, R. 1979. Work, mobility and participation: A comparative study of American and Japanese industry. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Dohse, K., Jurgens, U., & Malsch, T. 1985. From Taylorism to Toyotism? The social organization of the labor process in the Japanese automobile industry. Politics and Society, 14(2): 115-146.

Dore, R. 1973. British factory-Japanese factory: The origins of national diversity in industrial relations. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Flynn, B., Schroeder, R., & Sakakibara, S. 1995. The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, 26: 659-691.

Frenkel, M. 2008. The MNC as a third space: Rethinking international management knowledge through Homi Bhabha. Academy of Management Review, 33: 924-942.

Garrahan, P., & Stewart, P. 1992. The Nissan enigma. London: Mansell.

Guha, R. 1989. Dominance without hegemony and its historiography. In R. Guha (Ed.), Subaltern studies, volume VI: 210-309. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Hodson, R. 1996. Dignity in the workplace under participative management: Alienation and freedom revisited. American Sociological Review, 61: 719-738.

Kaviraj, S. 1992. The imaginary institution that was India. In R. Guha (Ed.), Subaltern studies, volume VII: 1-39. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.

Kondo, D. K. 1990. Crafting selves: Power, gender, and discourses of identity in a Japanese workplace. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kumazawa, M., & Yamada, J. 1989. Jobs and skills under the lifelong Nenko employment practice. In S. Wood (Ed.), The transformation of work?: 101-123. London: Hyman.

Lane, C. 1989. Management and labor in Europe. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.

Lane, C. 1992. European business systems: Britain and Germany compared. In R. Whitley (Ed.), European business systems: Firms and markets in their national contexts: 64-97. London: Sage Publications.

Lane, P., Koka, B., & Pathak, S. 2006. The reification of absorptive capacity: A critical review and rejuvenation of the construct. Academy of Management Review, 31: 833-863.

Lowe, J., Morris J., & Wilkinson, B. 1996. British factory, Japanese factory, Mexican factory: Supervisory systems in global context. Paper presented at the Globalization of Production and the Regulation of Labor Conference, Warwick, UK, September.

Miesing, P., Kriger, M., & Slough, N. 2007. Towards a model of effective knowledge transfer within transnationals: The case of Chinese foreign invested enterprises. Journal of Technology Transfer, 32(1-2): 109-122.

Mir, A., & Mir, R. 2005. Producing the governable employee: The strategic deployment of workplace empowerment. Cultural Dynamics, 17(1): 51-72.

Mir, R. 2001. Migrating ideas: An empirical study of intra-organizational knowledge transfer. Doctoral dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

Mir, R., Banerjee, S., & Mir, A. 2008. Hegemony and its discontents: A critical analysis of organizational knowledge transfer. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 4(2): 203-227.

Mir, R., & Mir, A. 2002. The organizational imagination: From paradigm wars to praxis. Organizational Research Methods, 5(1): 105-125.

Mir, R., & Mir, A. 2009. From the corporation to the colony: Studying knowledge transfer across international boundaries. Group and Organization Management, 34(1): 90-113.

Morgan, G., & Kristensen, P. 2006. The contested space of multinationals: Varieties of institutionalism, varieties of capitalism. Human Relations, 59: 1467-1490.

Ngai, P., & Smith, C. 2007. Putting transnational labour process in its place. Work, Employment and Society, 21(1): 27-42.

Okuno, M. 1984. Corporate loyalty and bonus payments: An analysis of work incentives in Japan. In M. Aoki (Ed.), The economic analysis of the Japanese firm: 387-411. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Ong, A. 1987. Spirits of resistance and capitalist discipline: Factory women in Malaysia. Albany: State University of New York Press.

Parker, M., & Slaughter, J. 1988. Choosing sides: Unions and the team concept. Detroit: Labor Notes.

Porter, S. 1973. Critical realist ethnography: The case of racism and professionalism in a medical setting. Sociology, 27: 591-609.

Prakash, G. 1994. Subaltern studies as postcolonial criticism. American Historical Review, 99: 1475-1490.

Prasad, A. 2003. The gaze of the other: Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis. New York: Palgrave.

Prasad, A., & Prasad, P. 2003. The empire of organizations and the organization of empires: Postcolonial considerations on theorizing workplace resistance. In A. Prasad (Ed.), Postcolonial theory and organizational analysis: 95-120. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Roy, A. 2006. An ordinary person's guide to empire. New Delhi, India: Penguin Books.

Said. E. 1994. Culture and imperialism. New York: Vintage Books.

Sayer, A. 1993. Method in social science: A realist approach. London, Routledge.

Scott, J. C. 1985. Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Westwood, R. (2006). International business and management studies as an orientalist discourse: A postcolonial critique. Critical Perspectives on International Business, 2(2): 91-99.

Whitley, R. 1992. Business systems in East Asia: Firms, markets and societies. London: Sage Publications.

Whitley, R. 1999. Divergent capitalisms: The social structuring and change of business systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Willem, A., & Scarbrough, H. 2006. Social capital and political bias in knowledge sharing: An exploratory study. Human Relations, 59: 1343-1370.

Williams, R. 1977. Marxism and literature. New York: Oxford University Press.

Zeitlin, J., & Herrigel, G. 2000. Americanization and its limits: Reworking U. S. technology and management in post-war Europe and Japan. New York: Oxford University Press.