10.2190/WR.14.2.g K011448534W35262 7 Promoting the Underlying Principle of Acceptance: The Effectiveness of Sexual Orientation Employment Antidiscrimination Legislation 251 268 20100719 20100719 20100719 20100719 K011448534W35262.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=K011448534W35262 2 Laura G. Barron University of Wisconsin-Stout Although previous research finds less perceived sexual orientation discrimination in areas with employment antidiscrimination legislation than in areas without such legislation, it remains unclear whether such findings hold for (a) quantitative hiring evaluations made by organizational decision makers and (b) privately held attitudes of prejudice. In a between-subjects design, human resource professionals in locales with or without sexual orientation antidiscrimination laws evaluated matched resumes of openly gay or presumably non-gay male applicants. Without antidiscrimination laws, gay applicants were rated as less hireable than non-gay applicants; with antidiscrimination laws, gay and non-gay applicants were rated equivalently. Further, antidiscrimination legislation was found to be related to decreased prejudice toward gay men, even after controlling for factors previously shown to impact community adoption of legislation (e.g., political and religious views). Analyses of hireability ratings lacked sufficient statistical power to discern this effect.

Adams, B. D. 1981. Stigma and employability: Discrimination by sex and sexual orientation in the Ontario legal profession. Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 18: 216-221.

Ambady, N., Hallahan, M., & Conner, B. 1999. Accuracy of judgments of sexual orientation from thin slices of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77: 538-547.

Baylor University. 2005. The Baylor Religion Survey. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://thearda.com/archive/files/descriptions/BRS2005.asp'>http://thearda.com/archive/files/descriptions/BRS2005.asp</a>

Blanchard, F. A., Crandall, C. S., Brigham, J. C., & Vaughn, L. A. 1994. Condemning and condoning racism: A social context approach to interracial settings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79: 993-997.

Blanchard, F. A., Lilly, T., & Vaughn, L. A. 1991. Reducing the expression of racial prejudice. Psychological Science, 2: 111-115.

Burstein, P. 1985. Discrimination, jobs, and politics: The struggle for equal opportunity in the United States since the New Deal. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Button, S. B. 2001. Organizational efforts to affirm sexual diversity: A cross-level examination. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 17-28.

Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. 2002. The Employment Non-Discrimination Act. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://ftp.resource.org/gpo.gov/hearings/107s/78032.txt'>http://ftp.resource.org/gpo.gov/hearings/107s/78032.txt</a>

Donohue, J. J. III, & Heckman, J. 1991. Continuous versus episodic change: The impact of civil rights policy on the economic status of blacks. Journal of Economic Literature, 29: 1603-1643.

Griffith, K. H., & Hebl, M. R. 2002. The disclosure dilemma for gay men and lesbians: "Coming out" at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 1191-1199.

Gunderson, M. 1989. Male-female wage differentials and policy responses. Journal of Economic Literature, 27: 46-72.

Haeberle, S. 1996. Gay men and lesbians at city hall. Social Science Quarterly, 77: 190-197.

Heckman, J., & Payner, B. 1989. Determining the impact of federal antidiscrimination policy on the economic status of blacks: A study of South Carolina. American Economic Review, 79: 138-177.

Herek, G. M. 1984. Attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A factor analytic study. Journal of Homosexuality, 10: 39-51.

Herek, G. M. 1994. Assessing heterosexuals' attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications: 206-228. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Herek, G. M. 1998. The Attitudes toward Lesbians and Gay Men (ATLG) scale. In C. M. Davis, W. H. Yarber, R. Bauserman, G. Schreer, & S. L. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of sexuality-related measures: A compendium: 392-394. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Herek, G. M., & Glunt, E. K. 1993. Interpersonal contact and heterosexuals' attitudes toward gay men: Results from a national survey. Journal of Sex Research, 30: 239-244.

Horvath, M., & Ryan, A. M. 2003. Antecedents and potential moderators of the relationship between attitudes and hiring discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. Sex Roles, 48: 115-130.

Inman, R. P., & Rubinfield, D. L. 1997. Rethinking federalism. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 11: 43-64.

Johnson, K. L., Gill, S., Reichman, V., & Tassinary, L. G. 2007. Swagger, sway, and sexuality: Judging sexual orientation from body motion and morphology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93: 321-334.

Monteith, M. J., Deneen, N. E., & Tooman, G. D. 1996. The effect of social norm activation on the expression of opinions concerning gay men and blacks. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18: 267-288.

Pew Global Attitudes Project. 2007. World publics welcome global trade—but not immigration. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=258'>http://pewglobal.org/reports/display.php?ReportID=258</a>

Ragins, B. R., & Cornwell, J. M. 2001. Pink triangles: Antecedents and consequences of perceived workplace discrimination against gay and lesbian employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 1244-1261.

Robinson, P. H., & Darley, J. M. 1995. Justice, liability, and blame: Community views and the criminal law. Boulder, CO: Westview.

Rubenstein, W. B. 2001. Do gay rights laws matter? An empirical assessment. Southern California Law Review, 75: 65-119.

Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. 2001. Prescriptive gender stereotypes and backlash toward agentic women. Journal of Social Issues, 57: 743-762.

Rule, N. O., Ambady, N., Adams, R. B., & Macrae, C. N. 2008. Accuracy and awareness in the perception and categorization of male sexual orientation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95: 1019-1028.

Smith, S. J., Axleton, A. M., & Saucier, D. A. 2009. The effects of contact on sexual prejudice: A meta-analysis. Sex Roles, 61: 178-191.

Stangor, C., Sechrist, G. B., & Jost, J. T. 2001. Changing racial beliefs by providing consensus information. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27: 486-496.

Wald, K. D., Button, J. W., & Rienzo, B. A. 1996. The politics of gay rights in American communities: Explaining antidiscrimination ordinances and policies. American Journal of Political Science, 40: 1152-1178.

Weichselbaumer, D. 2003. Sexual orientation discrimination in hiring. Labour Economics, 10: 629-642.

Wittenbrink, B., & Henly, J. R. 1996. Creating social reality: Informational social influence and content of stereotypic beliefs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22: 598-610.

Zitek, E. M., & Hebl, M. R. 2007. The role of social norm clarity in the influenced expression of prejudice over time. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43: 867-876.