10.2190/WR.16.3-4.g 5187H820U1248574 7 New Hegemonic Tendencies in the Production of Knowledge: How Research Quality Evaluation Schemes and the Corporatization of Journals Impact on Academic Life 367 382 20130308 20130308 20130308 20130308 5187H820U1248574.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=5187H820U1248574 3 Thomas Reuter University of Melbourne, Australia Many governments have now established systems for ranking academic journals in terms of their "quality," as evidenced by their "impact on the field." This article argues that the new ranking systems maintain or extend existing hegemonies of knowledge. While the declared goal of the schemes is to measure "academic output" more realistically than is possible with purely quantitative measures, the result is that journals previously considered equal are now ranked. While there has been consultation with academics, in Australia, for example, the scope provided for criticizing the scheme was limited to the details of how to rank particular journals. This formalization of journal rank orders will increase the degree of hierarchy in an international publishing world that is already full of disparities, between the core and periphery of power/knowledge, and between global and more local languages. If schemas of journal evaluation are shaped by the ethnocentrism of the globally dominant players, alternative cultural value-systems may be ignored and journals in marginal countries devalued. Another danger is that ranking can further marginalize different, alternative voices within our own culture, or within a shared global culture. Critical analysts in the humanities and social sciences, as well as all natural scientists whose work is in some way politicized, are particularly vulnerable to the kinds of punishments that now go along with publishing unpopular ideas in small, progressive journals at the bottom of the hierarchy. Several strategies are proposed for combating these trends. ABC. 2012. FOI emails reveal abuse of climate scientists. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-11/anu-releases-abusive-emails-sent-to-climate-scientists/4005132'>www.abc.net.au/news/2012-05-11/anu-releases-abusive-emails-sent-to-climate-scientists/4005132</a> Adorno, T. W., & Horkheimer, M. 2002. <b><i>Dialectic of enlightenment.</i></b> Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press. ARC. 2011. The Excellence in Research for Australia (ERA) Initiative. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.arc.gov.au/era/'>http://www.arc.gov.au/era/</a> ARC. 2012a. Contacts—Australian Research Council. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.arc.gov.au/contact/default.htm'>http://www.arc.gov.au/contact/default.htm</a> ARC. 2012b. Discipline matrix ERA 2012. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.arc.gov.au/xls/era12/era_2012_discipline_matrix.xls'>www.arc.gov.au/xls/era12/era_2012_discipline_matrix.xls</a> ARC. 2012c. The National Research Priorities and their associated priority goals. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/nrps_and_goals.pdf'>http://www.arc.gov.au/pdf/nrps_and_goals.pdf</a> Breen, J. 2002. Higher education in Australia: Structure, policy and debate. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/aused/aused.html'>http://www.csse.monash.edu.au/~jwb/aused/aused.html</a> Canberra University. 2012. Active research classification scheme guidelines. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.canberra.edu.au/ucresearch/policies/active-res'>http://www.canberra.edu.au/ucresearch/policies/active-res</a> Cost of knowledge, the. 2012. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://gowers.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/elsevierstatementfinal.pdf'>http://gowers.files.wordpress.com/2012/02/elsevierstatementfinal.pdf</a> ESF. 2010. ERIH "Initial" lists. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.oai.uzh.ch/old/images/stories/eingabe_in_zora_anleitung/kombinierte_liste_2008_05.pdf/'>http://www.oai.uzh.ch/old/images/stories/eingabe_in_zora_anleitung/kombinierte_liste_2008_05.pdf/</a> ESF. 2012. ERIH foreword. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-the-humanities/erih-foreword.html'>www.esf.org/research-areas/humanities/erih-european-reference-index-for-the-humanities/erih-foreword.html</a> Fight for the Future. 2012. Fight for the Future, defending our basic right and freedoms. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.fightforthefuture.org/'>http://www.fightforthefuture.org/</a> Flood, A. 2012. Scientists sign petition to boycott publisher Elsevier. <b><i>The Guardian (U. K.)</i></b>, February 2. Fromm, E. 1997. <b><i>To have or to be?</i></b> New York: Continuum Press. Herman, E. S., & Chomsky, N. 1988. <b><i>Manufacturing consent: The political economy of the mass media.</i></b> New York: Pantheon Books. Hill, J. S. 2012. Rinehart, The Age, and the end of Australian journalistic integrity. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://planetsave.com/2012/06/26/rinehart-the-age-and-the-end-of-australian-journalistic-integrit/'>http://planetsave.com/2012/06/26/rinehart-the-age-and-the-end-of-australian-journalistic-integrit/</a> Holcombe, A. O. 2012. Spread the word: Scientists are tearing down publishers' walls. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://theconversation.edu.au/spread-the-word-scientists-are-tearing-down-publishers-walls-509'>http://theconversation.edu.au/spread-the-word-scientists-are-tearing-down-publishers-walls-509</a> Kuhn, T. 1962. <b><i>The structure of scientific revolutions.</i></b> Chicago: University of Chicago Press. New laws whittle away academic freedom. 2008. <b><i>Canberra Times</i></b>, March 1. NIH. 2009. Frequently asked questions about the NIH Public Access Policy. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://publicaccess.nih.gov/FAQ.htm'>http://publicaccess.nih.gov/FAQ.htm</a> Pettmann, R. 2012. <b><i>Psychopathology and world politics.</i></b> London: World Scientific Publishing. QUT. 2009. QUT ePrints repository for research output. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/F/F_01_03.jsp'>http://www.mopp.qut.edu.au/F/F_01_03.jsp</a> RCUK. 2012. Policy on access to research outputs. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/outputs.aspx'>http://www.rcuk.ac.uk/research/Pages/outputs.aspx</a> Research without walls. 2012. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.researchwithoutwalls.org/About.aspx'>http://www.researchwithoutwalls.org/About.aspx</a> Shore, C., & Wright, S. 2011. Conceptualising policy: Technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Pero (Eds.), <b><i>Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power:</i></b> 1-20. New York: Berghahn. Tertiary Education Commission. 2009. Performance-based research fund. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.tec.govt.nz/Funding/Fund-finder/Performance-Based-Research-Fund-PBRF'>http://www.tec.govt.nz/Funding/Fund-finder/Performance-Based-Research-Fund-PBRF</a> UC Berkeley Library. 2012. Hot topics: Publisher mergers. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/scholarlycommunication/publisher_mergers.html'>http://www.lib.berkeley.edu/scholarlycommunication/publisher_mergers.html</a>