10.2190/WR.17.3-4.k VP7611760384T578 11 Location Independent Working in Academia: Enabling Employees or Supporting Managerial Control? 425 442 20141016 20141016 20141016 20141016 VP7611760384T578.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=VP7611760384T578 3 Amanda Lee Marialaura Di Domenico Mark N. K. Saunders University of Surrey, Guildford, UK In this article, we consider the extent to which the practice of location independent working (LIW) enables academic employees to make choices and have agency in their life-work balance, and the extent to which it may support (or potentially be used as a form of resistance to) increased managerial control. Set within the context of an increasingly performance-led, managerialist public sector landscape, the impact and implications of these working practices are examined through the lens of labour process theory. Drawing on findings from an ongoing in-depth ethnographic study set in a post-1992 university business school in central England, we suggest that the practice of LIW is being used both to enable employees and to support managerial control.

Adler, P. S. 2007. The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist critique of labour process theory. Organization Studies, 28: 1313-1345.

Anderson, G. 2006. Carving out time and space in the managerial university. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 19: 578-592.

Anderson, G. 2008. Mapping academic resistance in the managerial university. Organization, 15: 251-270.

Archer, L. 2008. The new neoliberal subjects? Young/er academics' constructions of professional identity. Journal of Education Policy, 23: 265-285.

Ball, S. J. 2003. The teacher's soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18: 215-228.

Barry, J., Berg, E., & Chandler, J. 2006. Academic shape shifting: Gender, management and identities in Sweden and England. Organization, 13: 275-298.

Braverman, H. 1974. Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century. New York: Monthly Review Press.

Bryson, C. 2004. What about the workers? The expansion of higher education and the transformation of academic work. Industrial Relations Journal, 35: 38-57.

Burawoy, M. 1979. Manufacturing consent: Changes in the labor process under monopoly capitalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Chandler, J., Barry, J., & Clark, H. 2002. Stressing academe: The wear and tear of the new public management. Human Relations, 55: 1051-1069.

Clarke, J., Gerwitz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (Eds.), 2000. New managerialism, new welfare? London: Sage.

Dahrendorf, R. 1959. Class and class conflict in industrial society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

Davies, A., & Thomas, R. 2002. Managerialism and accountability in higher education: The gendered nature of restructuring and the costs to academic service. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 13: 179-193.

Dearlove, J. 2002. A continuing role for academics: The governance of UK universities in the post-Dearing era. Higher Education Quarterly, 56: 257-275.

Deem, R., & Brehony, K. 2005. Management as ideology: The case of "new managerialism" in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31: 217-235.

Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. 2007. Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Diefenbach, T. 2009. New public management in public sector organizations: The dark sides of managerialistic enlightenment. Public Administration, 87: 892-909.

Edwards, R. 1979. Contested terrain: The transformation of the workplace in the twentieth century. London: Heinemann.

Fernie, S., & Metcalf, D. 1998. (Not) hanging on the telephone: Payment systems in the new sweatshops. London: Centre for Economic Performance, London School of Economics.

Fleming, P., & Spicer, A. 2003. Working at a cynical distance: Implications for power, subjectivity and resistance. Organization, 10: 157-179.

Friedman, A. 1977. Industry and labour: Class struggle at work and monopoly capitalism. London: Macmillan.

Hassard, J., Rowlinson, M., & Hogan, J. 2001. From labor process theory to critical management studies. Administrative Theory and Praxis, 23: 339-362.

Henkel, M. 2000. Academic identities and policy change in higher education. London: Jessica Kingsley.

Henkel, M. 2005. Academic identity in transformation? The case of the United Kingdom. Higher Education Management and Policy, 14(3): 137-187.

Hood, C. 2000. Paradoxes of public-sector managerialism, old public management and public service bargains. International Public Management Journal, 3: 1-22.

Jaros, S. J. 2005. Marxian critiques of Thompson's (1990) "core" labour process theory: An evaluation and extension. Evaluation, 5: 5-25.

Joint Information Systems Committee (JISC). 2007. Appendix G: Institutional exemplars call. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/capital/circular0107/appendix_g_0107_institutional_exemplars_call_final.doc'>http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/capital/circular0107/appendix_g_0107_institutional_exemplars_call_final.doc</a>

Knights, D., & McCabe, D. 2000. "Ain't misbehavin"? Opportunities for resistance under new forms of "quality" management. Sociology, 34: 421-436.

Knights, D., & Willmott, H. (Eds.) 1990. Labour process theory: Studies in the labour process. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.

Knights, D., & Willmott, H. 2007. Socialization, yes. Skill upgrading, probably. Robust theory of the capitalist labour process, no. Organization Studies, 28: 1369-1378.

Lal, B., & Dwivedi, Y. K. 2008. Investigating homeworkers' usage of mobile phones for overcoming feelings of professional isolation. International Journal of Mobile Communications, 6: 481-498.

Leonardi, P. M., Treem, J. W., & Jackson, M. H. 2010. The connectivity paradox: Using technology to both decrease and increase perceptions of distance in distributed work arrangements. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 38: 85-105.

Marx, K. 1867/1990. Capital: Critique of political economy Volume 1. London: Penguin Books.

Mather, K., Worrall. L., & Mather, G. 2012. Engineering compliance and resistance in UK further education: The creation of the Stepford Lecturer. Employee Relations, 34(5): 1-30.

Menzies, H., & Newson, J. 2007. No time to think: Academics' life in the globally wired university. Time and Society, 16: 83-98.

Morris, D. 2009. LIW final report. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/institutionalinnovation/liwfinalreport.doc'>http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/programmes/institutionalinnovation/liwfinalreport.doc</a>

O'Reilly, D., & Reed, M. 2010. "Leaderism": An evolution of managerialism in UK public service reform. Public Administration, 88: 960-978.

Parker, M., & Jary, D. 1995. The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization, 2: 319-338.

Prasad, P., & Prasad A. 2000. Stretching the iron cage: The constitutions and implications of routine workplace resistance. Organization Science, 11: 387-403.

Prichard, C., & Willmott, H. 1997. Just how managed is the McUniversity? Organization Studies, 18: 287-316.

Saunderson, W. 2002. Women, academia and identity: Constructions of equal opportunities in the "new managerialism"-A case of "lipstick on the gorilla"? Higher Education Quarterly, 56: 376-406.

Scott, J. 1985. Weapons of the weak—Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Smith, C. 2008. The short overview of the labour process perspective and history of the International Labour Process Conference. Retrieved from <a target="_blank" href='http://www.ilpc.org.uk/Portals/56/ilpc-docs/ILPC-Background.pdf'>http://www.ilpc.org.uk/Portals/56/ilpc-docs/ILPC-Background.pdf</a>

Taylor, F. W. 1911. The principles of scientific management. New York: Harper.

Taylor, P., & Bain, P. 2002. "An assembly line in the head": Work and employee relations in the call centre. Industrial Relations Journal, 30: 101-117.

Thompson, P., 1989. The nature of work: An introduction to debates on the labour process (2nd ed.). Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan.

Thompson, P. 2007. Adler's theory of the capitalist labour process: A pale(o) imitation. Organization Studies, 28: 1359-1368.

Thompson, P., & Smith, C. 2009. Labour power and labour process: Contesting the marginality of the sociology of work. Sociology, 43: 913-930.

Trowler, P. R. 1998. Academics responding to change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.

Tsoukas, H. 2007. Introduction to the forum on "The future of critical management studies: A paleo-Marxist view." Organization Studies, 28: 1309-1311.

Vallas, S. 2007. Paleo-paralysis? Work, organizations and the labour process debate. Organization Studies, 28: 1379-1385.

Wilson, M., & Greenhill, A., 2004. Gender and teleworking identities in the risk society: A research agenda. New Technology, Work and Employment, 19: 207-221.

Winter, R. 2009. Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31: 121-131.

Ylijoki, O. H., & Mntylä, H. 2003. Conflicting time perspectives in academic work. Time and Society, 12: 55-78.