Skip Navigation

Brought to you by: Stanford University Libraries Sign In as Personal Subscriber
Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 2005 5(2):121-141; doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi014
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yeager, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Makovich, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Yeager, K. R.
Right arrow Articles by Makovich, R.

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Original Article

Measured Response to Identified Suicide Risk and Violence: What You Need to Know About Psychiatric Patient Safety

   Kenneth R. Yeager, PhD
   Radu Saveanu, MD
   Albert R. Roberts, PhD
   Gabby Reissland, JD
   Dan Mertz, JD
   Avni Cirpili, MS, RN
   Ron Makovich, AIA

From the Ohio State University Medical Center

Contact Author: Kenneth R. Yeager, PhD, Director of Quality and Operational Improvement, OSU Harding Hospital, Ohio State University Medical Center, 1670 Upham Drive, Suite 120, Neurosciences Facility, Columbus, Ohio 43210. E-mail: yeager.5{at}osu.edu.

Within inpatient psychiatric settings exists evidence of a significant risk of violent incidents and incidents of deliberate self-harm. One of the most hidden and preventable mental health problems is the fact that approximately 1,500 suicides take place annually in inpatient hospital facilities throughout the United States. This article focuses on the advantages and disadvantages of risk and suicide assessment procedures while attempting to answer the following questions: What degree of risk currently exists on inpatient psychiatric facilities for harm to self and others? What can be done within the physical environment to protect the psychiatric patient? We discuss a combined risk and quality proactive approach to risk reduction through a safety equation integrating patient assessment, physical environment, program safety, and patient component to formalize a systems approach to the at-risk patient.

KEY WORDS: risk assessment, actuarial tools, suicide, safety assessment, inpatient, suicide assessment, violence prevention, physical environment






Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.