Skip Navigation

Brought to you by: Stanford University Libraries Sign In as Personal Subscriber

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention Advance Access originally published online on July 12, 2006
Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 2006 6(3):177-205; doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhl001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
6/3/177    most recent
mhl001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bender, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Bender, K.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J. S.

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org.

Original Article

Treatment Effectiveness With Dually Diagnosed Adolescents: A Systematic Review

   Kimberly Bender, MSW*
   David W. Springer, PhD, LCSW
   Johnny S. Kim, PhD, LICSW

From the School of Social Work, University of Texas at Austin (Bender and Springer) and the School of Social Welfare, University of Kansas (Kim)

* Contact author: Kimberly Bender, The University of Texas at Austin, School of Social Work, 1 University Station D3500, Austin, TX 78712. E-mail: kbender{at}mail.utexas.edu.

The treatment of dually diagnosed adolescents is challenging for many reasons, including complex treatment needs, poor treatment engagement and retention, and a lack of sustainable treatment outcomes. Although a large percentage of adolescents are diagnosed with both substance abuse and mental health diagnoses, research is only beginning to identify effective treatments for this population. The current study systematically reviews randomized clinical trials of interventions for dually diagnosed adolescents. Results examining both between-group effect sizes and within group changes indicate the efficacy of several treatment modalities in improving specific aspects of treatment needs but highlight family behavior therapy and individual cognitive problem-solving therapy as showing large effect sizes across externalizing, internalizing, and substance-abuse outcomes in dually diagnosed youth. The study further discusses the complexities of systematically evaluating the currently limited state of research on dually diagnosed youth. Finally, preliminary guidelines for treating dually diagnosed adolescents are derived from a review of those treatments shown to be most effective.

KEY WORDS: dual diagnosis, comorbid, adolescents, evidence-based treatment, outcome, systematic review






Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.