TABLE 3. Selected Results: Internalizing Behaviors.
| Author |
Overall effects: DV exposure and internalizing behavior |
Gender |
Age at data collection |
Recruitment setting |
Other |
|
| Kitzmann et al. (2003) |
d = .29 in correlational studies d = .40 in group-comparison studies |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference |
Effected outcomes in correlational studies only (categorized in four groups) |
Reporter status affected outcomesType of study affected outcomes |
| Wolfe et al. (2003) |
d = .42 |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference |
n/a |
Research variables (reporter, recruitment setting) produce larger effect size differences than age, gender, outcome type |
| Davies (2005) |
d = .48 |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference (categorized in three groups) |
|
| Jacobus (2005) |
d = .41 |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference |
ns effect size difference (categorized in two groups) |
ns effect size difference for research variables: publication status, reporter |
| Sternberg et al. (2006) |
Children exposed to DV were 2.03 times more likely to show internalizing problems than children in no-violence comparison group (p < .001) |
ns predictor |
Significant predictor, compared to ages 4–6: ages 10–14 were 1.65 times more likely to have internalizing problems in clinical range |
n/a |
For all groups, more children were in the nonclinical than clinical range |
|
ns = non-significant
