Skip Navigation

Institution: CLOCKSS Sign In as Personal Subscriber

Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention Advance Access originally published online on June 29, 2005
Brief Treatment and Crisis Intervention 2005 5(3):261-278; doi:10.1093/brief-treatment/mhi019
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
5/3/261    most recent
mhi019v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Disclaimer
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Hasselt, V. B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Malcolm, A. S.
Right arrow Articles by Van Hasselt, V. B.
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2005. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oupjournals.org.

Original Article

Critical Incident Stress Debriefing and Law Enforcement: An Evaluative Review

   Abigail S. Malcolm, MS
   Jessica Seaton, MS
   Aimee Perera, PsyD
   Donald C. Sheehan, MA
   Vincent B. Van Hasselt, PhD

From the Center for Psychological Studies, Nova Southeastern University (Malcolm, Seaton, Perera, Van Hasselt) and the Law Enforcement Communication Unit, Federal Bureau of Investigation Academy (Sheehan)

Contact author: Vincent B. Van Hasselt, Professor, Center for Psychological Studies, Nova Southeastern University, 3301 College Avenue, Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314-7796. E-mail: vanhasse{at}nova.edu.

Emergency and disaster mental health may have century-old foundations, but its development as a field is far from complete (Everly, 1999). One of the more popular tactical interventions within the field is the Critical Incident Stress Debriefing (CISD) model of small-group crisis intervention, developed by Jeffery T. Mitchell (sometimes referred to as the "Mitchell Model"). CISD is but one intervention that falls within the strategic array of crisis interventions collectively referred to as Critical Incident Stress Management (Everly & Mitchell, 1999; Sheehan, Everly, & Langlieb, 2004). With the advent of CISD came a burgeoning number of case studies, personal accounts, and clinical research reports all focused on the efficacy of CISD. The purpose of this paper is to examine and critique the literature specifically addressing the Mitchell Model of CISD with law enforcement. Suggestions for directions that future research on CISD with police officers might take are discussed.

KEY WORDS: CISD, CISM, law enforcement, debriefing, group crisis intervention


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Criminal Justice and BehaviorHome page
K. M. Newbold, J. M. Lohr, and R. Gist
Apprehended Without Warrant: Issues of Evidentiary Warrant for Critical Incident Services and Related Trauma Interventions in a Federal Law Enforcement Agency
Criminal Justice and Behavior, October 1, 2008; 35(10): 1337 - 1353.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.