RECONCILING "GETTING TO YES" AND THE BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING: A TWO-PIE APPROACH
LEONARD B. MANDELBAUM
DOI: 10.2190/0QHY-8NXR-8KR3-RWRM
Abstract
Can the nonadversial problem-solving strategies of Getting to Yes (Fisher/Ury) be applied effectively in collective bargaining where, frequently, trust levels are low and power may not be equally balanced? This article is a participant/observer case study of a lengthy contract negotiation in a public hospital. While it confirms previous research about the difficulties of implementing win/win approaches, the author finds that prebargaining training of at least one party and careful selection of issues makes a difference. At least where relationships are not hostile, partial application of integrative (win/win) bargaining techniques did work.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.