Name DOI
10.1601/nm.1222
Name
 (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
species
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = =)
Proper Form
Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Nomenclatural History
The species Novosphingobium subarcticum was originally described and validly published by Takeuchi et al. 2001. This name was affected by Judicial Opinion 81 in 2008. Hördt et al. published an emended description of this species in 2020. Takeuchi et al. formed this name in 2001 by placing the species Nohynek et al. 1996 into the genus Takeuchi et al. 2001. Lim et al. established this name as a later heterotypic synonym of (Delaporte and Daste 1956) Lim et al. 2007 in 2007.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.1222.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 26, 2020.

References

  1. Euzéby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03022-0 [PubMed].
  2. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005264-0 [PubMed].
  3. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].
  4. Lim YW, Moon EY, Chun J. Reclassification of Flavobacterium resinovorum Delaporte and Daste 1956 as Novosphingobium resinovorum comb. nov., with Novosphingobium subarcticum (Nohynek et al. 1996) Takeuchi et al. 2001 as a later heterotypic synonym. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1906-1908. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64852-0 [PubMed].
  5. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-4-1405 [PubMed].