Name DOI
10.1601/nm.1317
Name
 (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
species
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = = = = = = = =)
Proper Form
Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Nomenclatural History
The species Agrobacterium radiobacter was originally described by Conn 1942. This name appeared on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names 1980. This name was affected by Judicial Opinion 94 in 2014. Sawada et al. published an emended description of this species in 1993. Subsequent emendations were proposed by Zhang et al. in 2014 and Hördt et al. in 2020. In 2001, Young et al. established as the basonym of (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Young et al. 2001 .
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.1317.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 25, 2020.

References

  1. Conn HJ. Validity of the Genus Alcaligenes. J Bacteriol 1942; 44:353-360. [PubMed].
  2. Bouzar H. Request for a Judicial Opinion Concerning the Type Species of Agrobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 1994; 44:373-374. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-2-373.
  3. Sawada H, Ieki H, Oyaizu H, Matsumoto S. Proposal for rejection of Agrobacterium tumefaciens and revised descriptions for the genus Agrobacterium and for Agrobacterium radiobacter and Agrobacterium rhizogenes. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1993; 43:694-702. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-43-4-694 [PubMed].
  4. Young JM, Pennycook SR, Watson DRW. Proposal that Agrobacterium radiobacter has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:491-493. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64030-0 [PubMed].
  5. Oren A, Garrity G. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion no. 21. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000007-0.
  6. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Agrobacterium radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 has priority over Agrobacterium tumefaciens (Smith and Townsend 1907) Conn 1942 when the two are treated as members of the same species based on the principle of priority and Rule 23a, Note 1 as applied to the corresponding specific epithets. Opinion 94. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:3590-3592. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.069203-0 [PubMed].
  7. Beijerinck MW, van Delden A. Über die Assimilation des freien Stickstoffs durch Bakerien. Zentralbl Bakteriol Parasitenkd Infektionskr Hyg 1902; 9:3-43.
  8. Zhang L, Li X, Zhang F, Wang G. Genomic analysis of Agrobacterium radiobacter DSM 30147 and emended description of A. radiobacter (Beijerinck and van Delden 1902) Conn 1942 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Sawada et al. 1993. Stand Genomic Sci 2014; 9:574-584. https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.4688352 [PubMed].
  9. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225.
  10. Garrity GM, Labeda DP, Oren A. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes; XIIth International (IUMS) Congress of Bacteriology and Applied Microbiology. Minutes of the meetings, 3, 4 and 6 August 2008, Istanbul, Turkey. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:2775-2780. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.037366-0.
  11. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].
  12. Young JM, Kuykendall LD, Martínez-Romero E, Kerr A, Sawada H. A revision of Rhizobium Frank 1889, with an emended description of the genus, and the inclusion of all species of Agrobacterium Conn 1942 and Allorhizobium undicola de Lajudie et al. 1998 as new combinations: Rhizobium radiobacter, R. rhizogenes, R. rubi, R. undicola and R. vitis. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:89-103. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-1-89 [PubMed].