Name DOI
10.1601/nm.31873
Name
 (Liang et al. 2015) Wirth and Whitman 2018 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(Liang et al. 2015) Wirth and Whitman 2018 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
species
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = =)
Proper Form
Cognatiyoonia sediminum (Liang et al. 2015) Wirth and Whitman 2018 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Nomenclatural History
The species Cognatiyoonia sediminum was originally described and validly published by Wirth and Whitman 2018. Hördt et al. published an emended description of this species in 2020. Wirth and Whitman formed this name in 2018 by placing the species Liang et al. 2015 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 into the genus Wirth and Whitman 2018.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Cognatiyoonia sediminum (Liang et al. 2015) Wirth and Whitman 2018 emend. Hördt et al. 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.31873.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 25, 2020.

References

  1. Wirth JS, Whitman WB. Phylogenomic analyses of a clade within the roseobacter group suggest taxonomic reassignments of species of the genera Aestuariivita, Citreicella, Loktanella, Nautella, Pelagibaca, Ruegeria, Thalassobius, Thiobacimonas and Tropicibacter, and the proposal of six novel genera. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2018; 68:2393-2411. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.002833 [PubMed].
  2. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].