|
Proper Form
| Cryptosporangium aurantiacum Tamura and Hatano 2001 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018 |
Nomenclatural History
|
The species Cryptosporangium aurantiacum was originally described and validly published by Tamura and Hatano 2001. This name was affected by Judicial Opinion 81 in 2008. Nouioui et al. published an emended description of this species in 2018.
|
Citation
|
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Cryptosporangium aurantiacum Tamura and Hatano 2001 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.7663.
|
Source File
|
This information was last reviewed on September 19, 2018. |
References
- Euzéby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03022-0 [PubMed].
- Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005264-0 [PubMed].
- Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Pukall R, Klenk H-P, Goodfellow M, Göker M. Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2018; 9:2007-2007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007 [PubMed].
- Tamura T, Hatano K. Phylogenetic analysis of the genus Actinoplanes and transfer of Actinoplanes minutisporangius Ruan et al. 1986 and 'Actinoplanes aurantiacus' to Cryptosporangium minutisporangium comb. nov. and Cryptosporangium aurantiacum sp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:2119-2125. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-6-2119 [PubMed].