Name DOI
10.1601/nm.8147
Name
Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
genus
Nomenclatural Type
(designated species)
(Holmes et al. 1984) Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Taxonomy
Proper Form
Chryseobacterium Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022
Nomenclatural History
The genus Chryseobacterium was originally proposed and validly published by Vandamme et al. 1994. Kämpfer et al. published an emended description of this genus in 2009. Subsequent emendations were proposed by Wu et al. in 2013, Montero-Calasanz et al. in 2014, Chen et al. in 2015, Hahnke et al. in 2016, Nicholson et al. in 2020 and Heidler von Heilborn et al. in 2022. Kämpfer et al. transferred the members of Kim et al. 2004 emend. Nicholson et al. 2020 into this genus in 2009. Kämpfer et al. transferred the members of Yi et al. 2005 into this genus in 2009. Holmes et al. transferred the members of Peng et al. 2009 emend. Nicholson et al. 2020 into this genus in 2013. Hahnke et al. transferred the members of O'Sullivan et al. 2006 emend. Nicholson et al. 2020 into this genus in 2016. García-López et al. transferred the members of Joung et al. 2010 into this genus in 2019.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Chryseobacterium Vandamme et al. 1994 emend. Heidler von Heilborn et al. 2022.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.8147.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on June 1, 2022.

References


  1. Holmes B, Steigerwalt AG, Nicholson AC. DNA–DNA hybridization study of strains of Chryseobacterium, Elizabethkingia and Empedobacter and of other usually indoleproducing non-fermenters of CDC groups IIc, IIe, IIh and IIi, mostly from human clinical sources, and proposals of Chryseobacterium bernardetii sp. nov., Chryseobacterium carnis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium lactis sp. nov., Chryseobacterium nakagawai sp. nov. and Chryseobacterium taklimakanense comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:4639-4662. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.054353-0 [PubMed].
  2. Oren A, Garrity G. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion no. 21. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:7-10. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000007-0.
  3. Vandamme P, Bernardet JF, Segers P, Kersters K, Holmes B. New perspectives in the classification of the flavobacteria: description of Chryseobacterium gen. nov., Bergeyella gen. nov., and Empedobacter nom. rev. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1994; 44:827-831. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-44-4-827.
  4. Kämpfer P, Lodders N, Vaneechoutte M, Wauters G. Transfer of Sejongia antarctica, Sejongia jeonii and Sejongia marina to the genus Chryseobacterium as Chryseobacterium antarcticum comb. nov., Chryseobacterium jeonii comb. nov. and Chryseobacterium marinum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2238-2240. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.009142-0 [PubMed].
  5. Oren A, Garrity G. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion no. 22. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2015; 65:2028-2029. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.000286.
  6. Kämpfer P, Vaneechoutte M, Lodders N, De Baere T, Avesani V, Janssens M, Busse H-J, Wauters G. Description of Chryseobacterium anthropi sp. nov. to accommodate clinical isolates biochemically similar to Kaistella koreensis and Chryseobacterium haifense, proposal to reclassify Kaistella koreensis as Chryseobacterium koreense comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Chryseobacterium. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2009; 59:2421-2428. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.008250-0 [PubMed].
  7. Nicholson AC, Gulvik CA, Whitney AM, Humrighouse BW, Bell ME, Holmes B, Steigerwalt AG, Villarma A, Sheth M, Batra D, Rowe LA, Burroughs M, Pryor JC, Bernardet J-F, Hugo C, Kämpfer P, Newman JD, McQuiston JR. Division of the genus Chryseobacterium: Observation of discontinuities in amino acid identity values, a possible consequence of major extinction events, guides transfer of nine species to the genus Epilithonimonas, eleven species to the genus Kaistella, and three species to the genus Halpernia gen. nov., with description of Kaistella daneshvariae sp. nov. and Epilithonimonas vandammei sp. nov. derived from clinical specimens. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4432-4450. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003935 [PubMed].
  8. García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Gronow S, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Hahnke RL, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000 Type-Strain Genomes Improves Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front. Microbio. 2019; 10:2083-2083. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2019.02083 [PubMed].
  9. Heidler von Heilborn D, Nover L-L, Weber M, Hölzl G, Gisch N, Waldhans C, Mittler M, Kreyenschmidt J, Woehle C, Hüttel B, Lipski A. Polar lipid characterization and description of Chryseobacterium capnotolerans sp. nov., isolated from high CO2-containing atmosphere and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, and the species C. balustinum, C. daecheongense, C. formosense, C. gleum, C. indologenes, C. joostei, C. scophthalmum and C. ureilyticum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005372 [PubMed].
  10. Montero-Calasanz MC, Göker M, Rohde M, Spröer C, Schumann P, Busse H-J, Schmid M, Klenk H-P, Tindall BJ, Camacho M. Chryseobacterium oleae sp. nov., an efficient plant growth promoting bacterium in the rooting induction of olive tree (Olea europaea L.) cuttings and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, C. daecheongense, C. gambrini, C. gleum, C. joostei, C. jejuense, C. luteum, C. shigense, C. taiwanense, C. ureilyticum and C. vrystaatense. Syst Appl Microbiol 2014; 37:342-350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2014.04.004 [PubMed].
  11. Chen XY, Zhao R, Chen ZL, Liu L, Li XD, Li YH. Chryseobacterium polytrichastri sp. nov., isolated from a moss (Polytrichastrum formosum), and emended description of the genus Chryseobacterium. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2015; 107:403-410. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-014-0338-6 [PubMed].
  12. Hahnke RL, Meier-Kolthoff JP, García-López M, Mukherjee S, Huntemann M, Ivanova NN, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Klenk H-P, Göker M. Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of Bacteroidetes. Front. Microbio. 2016; 7:1-37. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2016.02003 [PubMed].
  13. Wu Y-F, Wu Q-L, Liu S-J. Chryseobacterium taihuense sp. nov., isolated from a eutrophic lake, and emended descriptions of the genus Chryseobacterium, Chryseobacterium taiwanense, Chryseobacterium jejuense and Chryseobacterium indoltheticum. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:913-919. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.040337-0 [PubMed].