Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.23645
Names
 corrig. Iino et al. 2013 emend. Hördt et al. 2020, (sic) Iino et al. 2013 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Taxonomic Rank
species
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
Beijerinck 1898 emend. De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980)
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= =)
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this species within the root Universal Root.
  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  (sic) Garrity et al. 2021
  Garrity et al. 2006
  Pfennig and Trüper 1971 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
  (ex Henrici 1939) Gillis and De Ley 1980 emend. Hördt et al. 2020
  Beijerinck 1898 emend. De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980)
  corrig. Iino et al. 2013 emend. Hördt et al. 2020

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the species Acetobacter persici corrig. Iino et al. 2013 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 and Acetobacter persicus (sic) Iino et al. 2013 emend. Hördt et al. 2020. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.23645.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 25, 2020.

References

  1. Iino T, Suzuki R, Kosako Y, Ohkuma M, Komagata L, Uchimura T. Acetobacter okinawensis sp. nov., Acetobacter papayae sp. nov., and Acetobacter persicus sp. nov.; novel acetic acid bacteria isolated from stems of sugarcane, fruits, and a fl ower in Japan. J Gen Appl Microbiol 2012; 58:235-243. https://doi.org/10.2323/jgam.58.235 [PubMed].