Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.8616
Name
Ding and Yokota 2004 emend. Dobritsa et al. 2010
Taxonomic Rank
species
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
Baldani et al. 1986 emend. Carro et al. 2012
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = =)
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this species within the root Universal Root.

  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  (sic) Garrity et al. 2021
  Garrity et al. 2006 emend. Boden et al. 2017
  Garrity et al. 2006
  Garrity et al. 2006
  Baldani et al. 1986 emend. Carro et al. 2012
  Ding and Yokota 2004 emend. Dobritsa et al. 2010

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the species Herbaspirillum putei Ding and Yokota 2004 emend. Dobritsa et al. 2010. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.8616.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on January 11, 2017.

References


  1. Ding L, Yokota A. Proposals of Curvibacter gracilis gen. nov., sp. nov. and Herbaspirillum putei sp. nov. for bacterial strains isolated from well water and reclassification of [Pseudomonas] huttiensis, [Pseudomonas] lanceolata, [Aquaspirillum] delicatum and [Aquaspirillum] autotrophicum as Herbaspirillum huttiense comb. nov., Curvibacter lanceolatus comb. nov., Curvibacter delicatus comb. nov. and Herbaspirillum autotrophicum comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:2223-2230. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02975-0 [PubMed].