Name DOI
10.1601/nm.1237
Name
 (Zipper et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas herbicidovorans Zipper et al. 1997
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(Zipper et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas herbicidovorans Zipper et al. 1997
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
species
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = = =)
Proper Form
Sphingobium herbicidovorans (Zipper et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas herbicidovorans Zipper et al. 1997
Nomenclatural History
The species Sphingobium herbicidovorans was originally described and validly published by Takeuchi et al. 2001. This name was affected by Judicial Opinion 81 in 2008. Hördt et al. published an emended description of this species in 2020. Takeuchi et al. formed this name in 2001 by placing the species Zipper et al. 1997 into the genus Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Li et al. 2013. Yabuuchi et al. established as a later homotypic synonym of Zipper et al. 1997 in 2002.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Sphingobium herbicidovorans (Zipper et al. 1997) Takeuchi et al. 2001 emend. Hördt et al. 2020 pro synon. Sphingomonas herbicidovorans Zipper et al. 1997.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.1237.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 26, 2020.

References

  1. Euzéby JP, Tindall BJ. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27(3) and 30 of the Bacteriological Code. Request for an Opinion. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:293-301. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.03022-0 [PubMed].
  2. Judicial Commission of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes. Status of strains that contravene Rules 27 (3) and 30 of the International Code of Nomenclature of Bacteria. Opinion 81. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1755-1763. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/005264-0 [PubMed].
  3. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].
  4. Yabuuchi E, Kosako Y, Fujiwara N, Naka T, Matsunaga I, Ogura H, Kobayashi K. Emendation of the genus Sphingomonas Yabuuchi et al. 1990 and junior objective synonymy of the species of three genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, in conjunction with Blastomonas ursincola. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1485-1496. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-52-5-1485 [PubMed].
  5. Takeuchi M, Hamana K, Hiraishi A. Proposal of the genus Sphingomonas sensu stricto and three new genera, Sphingobium, Novosphingobium and Sphingopyxis, on the basis of phylogenetic and chemotaxonomic analyses. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2001; 51:1405-1417. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-51-4-1405 [PubMed].