Name DOI
10.1601/nm.882
Name
 (Frateur 1950) De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
(Frateur 1950) De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
subspecies
Nomenclatural Type
(designated strain)
Refer to the type exemplar.
Taxonomy
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = = = =)
Proper Form
Acetobacter pasteurianus paradoxus (Frateur 1950) De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020
Nomenclatural History
The subspecies Acetobacter pasteurianus paradoxus was originally described by De Ley and Frateur 1974. This name appeared on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names 1980. Hördt et al. published an emended description of this subspecies in 2020. Gosselé et al. established this name as a later heterotypic synonym of (Hansen 1879) Beijerinck and Folpmers 1916 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020 in 1983. Kim et al. established this name as a later heterotypic synonym of (Henneberg 1898) Kim et al. 2020 in 2018. Hördt et al. elevated this subspecies to the rank of species to form the name (Frateur 1950) Hördt et al. 2020 in 2020.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Acetobacter pasteurianus paradoxus (Frateur 1950) De Ley and Frateur 1974 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Hördt et al. 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.882.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on March 25, 2020.

References

  1. Gosselé F, Swings J, Kersters K, Pauwels P, De Ley J. Numerical Analysis of Phenotypic Features and Protein Gel Electrophoregrams of a Wide Variety of Acetobacter strains. Proposal for the Improvement of the Taxonomy of the Genus Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898, 215. Syst Appl Microbiol 1983; 4:338-368. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(83)80020-4 [PubMed].
  2. Euzéby J. Notification of changes in taxonomic opinion previously published outside the IJSEM. List of Changes in Taxonomic Opinion no. 18. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:2371-2372. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.054643-0.
  3. Kim KH, Cho GY, Chun BH, Weckx S, Moon JY, Yeo S-H, Jeon CO. Acetobacter oryzifermentans sp. nov., isolated from Korean traditional vinegar and reclassification of the type strains of Acetobacter pasteurianus subsp. ascendens (Henneberg 1898) and Acetobacter pasteurianus subsp. paradoxus (Frateur 1950) as Acetobacter ascendens sp. nov., comb. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 2018; 41:324-332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.syapm.2018.03.003 [PubMed].
  4. Skerman VBD, McGowan V, Sneath PHA. Approved Lists of Bacterial Names. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:225-420. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-225.
  5. Frateur J. Essai sur la systématique des acetobacters. Cellule 1950; 53:287-392.
  6. Hördt A, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Tindall BJ, Weinhold L-M, Gronow S, Kyrpides N, Woyke T, Schleuning M, Göker M. Analysis of 1,000+ Type-Strain Genomes Substantially Improves Taxonomic Classification of Alphaproteobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2020; 11:468. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2020.00468 [PubMed].
  7. De Ley J, Frateur J. Genus Acetobacter Beijerinck 1898, 215. In: Buchanan RE, Gibbons NE (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, Eighth Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1974, p. 276-278.