Name DOI
10.1601/nm.30036
Name
 (sic) Preer et al. 1974
Name Status
Not Validly Published, Illegitimate
Current Authority
(sic) Preer et al. 1974
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
family
Nomenclatural Type
(genus on whose name the name of this taxon is based)
 (sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982 emend. Schrallhammer et al. 2018 corrig. (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982 emend. Schrallhammer et al. 2018
Taxonomy
Proper Form
Caedobacteriaceae (sic) Preer et al. 1974
Nomenclatural History
The family Caedobacteriaceae was originally proposed by Preer et al. 1974. Preer and Preer corrected this name from (sic) to . Garrity et al. replaced this illegitimate name with Garrity et al. 2007 in 2007.

This name is illegitimate because the spelling does not match that of the Validly Published genus upon which it is based.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Caedobacteriaceae (sic) Preer et al. 1974.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.30036.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on April 20, 2017.

References

  1. Preer JR, Preer LB. Revival of names of protozoan endosymbionts and proposal of Holospora caryophila nom. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1982; 32:140-141. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-32-1-140.
  2. Preer JR, Preer LB, Jurand A. Kappa and other endosymbionts in Paramecium aurelia. Bacteriol Rev 1974; 38:113-163. [PubMed].
  3. Garrity GM, Lilburn TG, Cole JR, Harrison SH, Euzeby J, Tindall BJ. Part 3 – The Bacteria: Phylum Proteobacteria, Class Alphaproteobacteria. The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea Release 7.7, Michigan State University Board of Trustees, 2007, p. 52-111.