Name DOI
10.1601/nm.36438
Name
 Kim and Lee 2020
Name Status
Validly Published
Current Authority
Kim and Lee 2020
Preferred Name
Taxonomic Rank
genus
Nomenclatural Type
(designated species)
 (Thongphrom et al. 2017) Kim and Lee 2020
Taxonomy
Proper Form
Pseudothioclava Kim and Lee 2020
Nomenclatural History
The genus Pseudothioclava was originally proposed by Kim and Lee 2020. This name became validly published when it appeared on Validation List No. 194 in 2020.
Citation
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Pseudothioclava Kim and Lee 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.36438.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on April 28, 2020.

References

  1. Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation List No. 194. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4043-4049. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004244.
  2. Kim Y-J, Lee SD. Hahyoungchilella caricis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a rhizosphere mudflat of a halophyte (Carex scabrifolia), transfer of Thioclava arenosa Thongphrom et al. 2017 to Pseudothioclava as Pseudothioclava arenosa gen. nov., comb. nov. and proposal of Thioclava electrotropha Chang et al. 2018 as a later heterosynonym of Thioclava sediminum. J Microbiol 2019; 57:1048-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-9260-y [PubMed].
  3. Kim Y-J, Lee SD. Erratum to: Hahyoungchilella caricis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a rhizosphere mudflat of a halophyte (Carex scabrifolia), transfer of Thioclava arenosa Thongphrom et al. 2017 to Pseudothioclava as Pseudothioclava arenosa gen. nov., comb. nov. and proposal of Thioclava electrotropha Chang et al. 2018 as a later heterosynonym of Thioclava sediminum. J Microbiol 2020; 58:341-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-020-9725-z [PubMed].