|
Proper Form
| Pseudothioclava arenosa (Thongphrom et al. 2017) Kim and Lee 2020 |
Nomenclatural History
|
The species Pseudothioclava arenosa was originally described by Kim and Lee 2020. This name became validly published when it appeared on Validation List No. 194 in 2020. Kim and Lee formed this name in 2019 by placing the species
Thioclava arenosa Thongphrom et al. 2017
into the genus Pseudothioclava Kim and Lee 2020.
|
Citation
|
When referring specifically to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Name Abstract for Pseudothioclava arenosa (Thongphrom et al. 2017) Kim and Lee 2020.. https://doi.org/10.1601/nm.36439.
|
Source File
|
This information was last reviewed on April 28, 2020. |
References
- Oren A, Garrity GM. Validation List No. 194. List of new names and new combinations previously effectively, but not validly, published. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:4043-4049. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004244.
- Kim Y-J, Lee SD. Hahyoungchilella caricis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a rhizosphere mudflat of a halophyte (Carex scabrifolia), transfer of Thioclava arenosa Thongphrom et al. 2017 to Pseudothioclava as Pseudothioclava arenosa gen. nov., comb. nov. and proposal of Thioclava electrotropha Chang et al. 2018 as a later heterosynonym of Thioclava sediminum. J Microbiol 2019; 57:1048-1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-019-9260-y [PubMed].
- Kim Y-J, Lee SD. Erratum to: Hahyoungchilella caricis gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a rhizosphere mudflat of a halophyte (Carex scabrifolia), transfer of Thioclava arenosa Thongphrom et al. 2017 to Pseudothioclava as Pseudothioclava arenosa gen. nov., comb. nov. and proposal of Thioclava electrotropha Chang et al. 2018 as a later heterosynonym of Thioclava sediminum. J Microbiol 2020; 58:341-341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12275-020-9725-z [PubMed].