Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.1018
Names
(sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982, corrig. (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982
Taxonomic Rank
species
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
(sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982 emend. Schrallhammer et al. 2018
Type Strain
representative organism
T (= = =)
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this species within the root Universal Root.

  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  (sic) Garrity et al. 2021
  Garrity et al. 2006
  Gieszczykiewicz 1939 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Dumler et al. 2001
  Garrity et al. 2007
  (sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982 emend. Schrallhammer et al. 2018
  (sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the species Caedobacter taeniospiralis (sic) (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982 and Caedibacter taeniospiralis corrig. (ex Preer et al. 1974) Preer and Preer 1982. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.1018.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on February 19, 2018.

References


  1. Preer JR, Preer LB. Revival of names of protozoan endosymbionts and proposal of Holospora caryophila nom. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1982; 32:140-141. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-32-1-140.