Taxon DOI

10.1601/tx.4148

Name

Roseburia Stanton and Savage 1983

Taxonomic Rank

genus

Methodology

Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]

Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)

Parent

Taxon Record	Name Record
family	Lachnospiraceae Rainey 2010

Members

species	Roseburia cecicola Stanton and Savage 1983
species	Roseburia amylophila Hitch et al. 2022
species	Roseburia difficilis Liu et al. 2022
species	Roseburia faecis Duncan et al. 2006
species	Roseburia hominis Duncan et al. 2006
species	Roseburia intestinalis Duncan et al. 2002 emend. Duncan et al. 2006
species	Roseburia inulinivorans Duncan et al. 2006
species	Roseburia lenta Liu et al. 2022
species	Roseburia porci Wylensek et al. 2021
species	Roseburia rectibacter Liu et al. 2021
species	Roseburia yibonii Liu et al. 2021
species	Roseburia zhanii Liu et al. 2022

Type Status

Taxonomy

The taxonomic placement of this genus within the root Universal Root.


root Universal Root Woese et al. 1990
domain Bacteria (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
phylum Firmicutes (sic) Gibbons and Murray 2021
class Clostridia Rainey 2010
order Eubacteriales Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Tindall 2019
family Lachnospiraceae Rainey 2010
genus Roseburia Stanton and Savage 1983

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.

Citation

When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.

Taxon Abstract for the genus Roseburia Stanton and Savage 1983. Retrieved April 22, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.4148.

Source File

10.1601/tx.4148.xml


This information was last reviewed on February 22, 2022.

References

Stanton TB, Savage DC. Roseburia cecicola gen. nov. sp. nov., a motile , obligately anaerobic bacterium from a mouse cecum. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1983; 33:618-627. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-33-3-618.
Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Oren A, Overmann J, Lawley TD, Clavel T. Automated analysis of genomic sequences facilitates high-throughput and comprehensive description of bacteria. ISME Commun 2021; 1:16. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43705-021-00017-z.
Wylensek D, Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Afrizal A, Kumar N, Wortmann E, Liu T, Devendran S, Lesker TR, Hernández SB, Heine V, Buhl EM, M D'Agostino P, Cumbo F, Fischöder T, Wyschkon M, Looft T, Parreira VR, Abt B, Doden HL, Ly L, Alves JMP, Reichlin M, Flisikowski K, Suarez LN, Neumann AP, Suen G, de Wouters T, Rohn S, Lagkouvardos I, Allen-Vercoe E, Spröer C, Bunk B, Taverne-Thiele AJ, Giesbers M, Wells JM, Neuhaus K, Schnieke A, Cava F, Segata N, Elling L, Strowig T, Ridlon JM, Gulder TAM, Overmann J, Clavel T. A collection of bacterial isolates from the pig intestine reveals functional and taxonomic diversity. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6389-6389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19929-w [PubMed].
Duncan SH, Hold GL, Barcenilla A, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. Roseburia intestinalis sp. nov., a novel saccharolytic, butyrate-producing bacterium from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2002; 52:1615-1620. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02143-0 [PubMed].
Liu C, Du M-X, Abuduaini R, Yu H-Y, Li D-H, Wang Y-J, Zhou N, Jiang M-Z, Niu P-X, Han S-S, Chen H-H, Shi W-Y, Wu L, Xin Y-H, Ma J, Zhou Y, Jiang C-Y, Liu H-W, Liu S-J. Enlightening the taxonomy darkness of human gut microbiomes with a cultured biobank. Microbiome 2021; 9:119-119. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40168-021-01064-3 [PubMed].
Duncan SH, Aminov RI, Scott KP, Louis P, Stanton TB, Flint HJ. Proposal of Roseburia faecis sp. nov., Roseburia hominis sp. nov. and Roseburia inulinivorans sp. nov., based on isolates from human faeces. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2006; 56:2437-2441. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64098-0 [PubMed].