Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.5952
Name
 Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Stackebrandt et al. 1982
Taxonomic Rank
genus
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
Stackebrandt and Prauser 1991 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Members
(Kellerman and McBeth 1912) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Lee et al. 2008
Yamamura et al. 2019 emend. Wu et al. 2021
Kim et al. 2020
(Kellerman et al. 1913) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980)
Jones et al. 2005
Shi et al. 2012 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Stackebrandt and Kandler 1980 emend. Stackebrandt et al. 1982
(Kellerman et al. 1913) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
(Metcalf and Brown 1957) Stackebrandt and Keddie 1988
Yoon et al. 2008
Lee et al. 2020
Kang et al. 2007
Brown et al. 2005
Li et al. 2020
Bagnara et al. 1985
(McBeth and Scales 1913) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Dahal et al. 2022
(Kellerman et al. 1913) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980)
Christopherson et al. 2013
Funke et al. 1996
(sic) (Gledhill and Casida 1969) Collins and Pascual 2000
Elberson et al. 2000
Zhang et al. 2013 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Lagier et al. 2015 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
Hatayama et al. 2013
Ahmed et al. 2014
Elberson et al. 2000
Rusznyák et al. 2011
Tian et al. 2019
Tian et al. 2020
Hatayama et al. 2013
Shi et al. 2020
An et al. 2005
(Erikson 1954) Stackebrandt et al. 1983
(Kellerman et al. 1913) Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980)
Rivas et al. 2004
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this genus within the root Universal Root.
  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  (sic) Goodfellow 2021 non Actinobacteria Stackebrandt et al. 1997
  Krasil'nikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980)
  Salam et al. 2020
  Stackebrandt and Prauser 1991 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
  Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Stackebrandt et al. 1982

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Stackebrandt et al. 1982. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.5952.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on February 3, 2022.

References

  1. Bergey DH, Harrison FC, Breed RS, Hammer BW, Huntoon FM. In: Bergey DH, Harrison FC, Breed RS, Hammer BW, Huntoon FM (eds), Bergey's Manual of Determinative Bacteriology, First Edition, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1923, p. 1-442.
  2. Shi Y-L, Sun Y, Ruan Z-Y, Su J, Yu L-Y, Zhang Y-Q. Cellulomonas telluris sp. nov., an endoglucanase-producing actinobacterium isolated from Badain Jaran desert sand. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:631-635. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003806 [PubMed].
  3. Dahal RH, Kim J, Kim D-U, Dong K, Hong Y, Chaudhary DK. Cellulomonas fulva sp. nov., isolated from oil-contaminated soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2022; 72:. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.005209 [PubMed].
  4. Yoon MH, Ten LN, Im WT, Lee ST. Cellulomonas chitinilytica sp. nov., a chitinolytic bacterium isolated from cattle-farm compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:1878-1884. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64768-0 [PubMed].
  5. An DS, Im WT, Yang HC, Kang MS, Kim KK, Jin L, Kim MK, Lee ST. Cellulomonas terrae sp. nov., a cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1705-1709. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63696-0 [PubMed].
  6. Rusznyák A, Tóth EM, Schumann P, Spröer C, Makk J, Szabó G, Vladár P, Márialigeti K, Borsodi AK. Cellulomonas phragmiteti sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium isolated from reed (Phragmites australis) periphyton in a shallow soda pond. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2011; 61:1662-1666. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.022608-0 [PubMed].
  7. Collins MD, Pascual C. Reclassification of Actinomyces humiferus (Gledhill and Casida) as Cellulomonas humilata nom. corrig., comb. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:661-663. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-2-661 [PubMed].
  8. Stackebrandt E, Seiler H, Schleifer KH. Union of the genera Cellulomonas Bergey et al. and Oerskovia Prauser et al. in a redefined genus Cellulomonas. Zentralbl Bakteriol Orig A 1982; 3:401-409. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0721-9571(82)80022-7.
  9. Lagier J-C, Ramasamy D, Rivet R, Raoult D, Fournier P-E. Non contiguous-finished genome sequence and description of Cellulomonas massiliensis sp. nov. Stand Genomic Sci 2012; 7:258-270. https://doi.org/10.4056/sigs.3316719 [PubMed].
  10. Stackebrandt E, Prauser H. Assignment of the genera Cellulomonas, Oerskovia, Promicromonospora, and Jonesia to Cellulomonadaceae fam. nov. Syst Appl Microbiol 1991; 14:261-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0723-2020(11)80378-4.
  11. Brown JM, Frazier RP, Morey RE, Steigerwalt AG, Pellegrini GJ, Daneshvar MI, Hollis DG, McNeil MM. Phenotypic and genetic characterization of clinical isolates of CDC coryneform group A-3: proposal of a new species of Cellulomonas, Cellulomonas denverensis sp. nov. J Clin Microbiol 2005; 43:1732-1737. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.43.4.1732-1737.2005 [PubMed].
  12. Stackebrandt E, Keddie RM. Genus Cellulomonas Bergey et al. 1923, 154, emend. mut. char. Clark 1952, 50AL. In: Holt JG (ed), Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology, First Edition, Volume 2, The Williams and Wilkins Co., Baltimore, 1986, p. 1325-1329.
  13. Kang MS, Im WT, Jung HM, Kim MK, Goodfellow M, Kim KK, Yang HC, An DS, Lee ST. Cellulomonas composti sp. nov., a cellulolytic bacterium isolated from cattle farm compost. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007; 57:1256-1260. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63974-0 [PubMed].
  14. Li Y-Q, Zhang H, Xiao M, Dong Z-Y, Zhang J-Y, Narsing Rao MP, Li W-J. Cellulomonas endophytica sp. nov., isolated from Gastrodia elata Blume. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:3091-3095. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004133 [PubMed].
  15. Lee CM, Weon HY, Hong SB, Jeon YA, Schumann P, Kroppenstedt RM, Kwon SW, Stackebrandt E. Cellulomonas aerilata sp. nov., isolated from an air sample. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2008; 58:2925-2929. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.2008/002253-0 [PubMed].
  16. Tian Y, Han C, Hu J, Zhao J, Zhang C, Guo X, Wang X, Xiang W. Cellulomonas rhizosphaerae sp. nov., a novel actinomycete isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:1001-1008. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003258 [PubMed].
  17. Yamamura H, Hayashi T, Hamada M, Kohda T, Serisawa Y, Matsuyama-Serisawa K, Nakagawa Y, Otoguro M, Yanagida F, Tamura T, Hayakawa M. Cellulomonas algicola sp. nov., an actinobacterium isolated from a freshwater alga. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2019; 69:2723-2728. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003549 [PubMed].
  18. Kim S-K, Kook M, Yan Z-F, Trinh H, Zheng S-D, Yang J-E, Park S-Y, Yi T-H. Cellulomonas aurantiaca sp. nov., isolated from a soil sample from a tangerine field. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 2019; 112:1623-1632. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-019-01288-2 [PubMed].
  19. Lee H-J, Kim S-Y, Whang K-S. Cellulomonas citrea sp. nov., isolated from paddy soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:5304-5311. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004409 [PubMed].
  20. Hatayama K, Esaki K, Ide T. Cellulomonas soli sp. nov. and Cellulomonas oligotrophica sp. nov., isolated from soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:60-65. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.038364-0 [PubMed].
  21. Funke G, Pascual Ramos C, Collins MD. Identification of some clinical strains of CDC coryneform group A-3 and A-4 bacteria as Cellulomonas species and proposal of Cellulomonas hominis sp. nov. for some group A-3 strains. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33:2091-2097. [PubMed].
  22. Tian Z, Lu S, Jin D, Yang J, Pu J, Lai X-H, Ren Z-H, Wu X-M, Li J, Wang S, Xu J. Cellulomonas shaoxiangyii sp. nov., isolated from faeces of Tibetan antelope (Pantholops hodgsonii) on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2204-2210. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.003939 [PubMed].
  23. Stackebrandt E, Kandler O. Cellulomonas cartae sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1980; 30:186-188. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-30-1-186.
  24. Zhang L, Xi L, Qiu D, Song L, Dai X, Ruan J, Huang Y. Cellulomonas marina sp. nov., isolated from deep-sea water. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2013; 63:3014-3018. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.048876-0 [PubMed].
  25. Rivas R, Trujillo ME, Mateos PF, Martínez-Molina E, Velázquez E. Cellulomonas xylanilytica sp. nov., a cellulolytic and xylanolytic bacterium isolated from a decayed elm tree. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2004; 54:533-536. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.02866-0 [PubMed].
  26. Shi Z, Luo G, Wang G. Cellulomonas carbonis sp. nov., isolated from coal mine soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2012; 62:2004-2010. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.034934-0 [PubMed].
  27. Bagnara C, Toci R, Gaudin C, Belaich JP. Isolation and characterization of a cellulolytic microorganism, Cellulomonas fermentans sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1985; 35:502-507. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-35-4-502.
  28. Jones BE, Grant WD, Duckworth AW, Schumann P, Weiss N, Stackebrandt E. Cellulomonas bogoriensis sp. nov., an alkaliphilic cellulomonad. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2005; 55:1711-1714. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.63646-0 [PubMed].
  29. Elberson MA, Malekzadeh F, Yazdi MT, Kameranpour N, Noori-Daloii MR, Matte MH, Shahamat M, Colwell RR, Sowers KR. Cellulomonas persica sp. nov. and Cellulomonas iranensis sp. nov., mesophilic cellulose-degrading bacteria isolated from forest soils. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2000; 50:993-996. https://doi.org/10.1099/00207713-50-3-993 [PubMed].
  30. Ahmed I, Kudo T, Abbas S, Ehsan M, Iino T, Fujiwara T, Ohkuma M. Cellulomonas pakistanensis sp. nov., a novel moderately halotolerant Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2014; 64:2305-2311. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.059063-0 [PubMed].
  31. Christopherson MR, Suen G, Bramhacharya S, Jewell KA, Aylward FO, Mead D, Brumm PJ. The Genome Sequences of Cellulomonas fimi and “Cellvibrio gilvus” Reveal the Cellulolytic Strategies of Two Facultative Anaerobes, Transfer of “Cellvibrio gilvus” to the Genus Cellulomonas, and Proposal of Cellulomonas gilvus sp. nov. PLoS One 2013; 8:e53954. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053954 [PubMed].