Taxon DOI
10.1601/tx.29156
Name
 Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Dekio et al. 2019
Taxonomic Rank
genus
Methodology
Nomenclatural Taxonomy [1980-2022]
Incertae sedis taxa are placed using SOSCC (Garrity and Lilburn 2008)
Parent
Taxon RecordName Record
Delwiche 1957 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Zhi et al. 2009
Members
(Dekio et al. 2015) Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
(Eggerth 1935) Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
(Prévot 1938) Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Dekio et al. 2020
Dekio et al. 2020 emend. Dekio et al. 2021
(Aubin et al. 2016) Nouioui et al. 2018 emend. Dekio et al. 2020
Wylensek et al. 2021
Type Status
Taxonomy
The taxonomic placement of this genus within the root Universal Root.
  Woese et al. 1990
  (None 2015) Woese et al. 1990
  (sic) Goodfellow 2021 non Actinobacteria Stackebrandt et al. 1997
  Krasil'nikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980)
  (Rainey et al. 1997) Patrick and McDowell 2015 emend. Nouioui et al. 2018
  Delwiche 1957 (Approved Lists 1980) emend. Zhi et al. 2009
  Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Dekio et al. 2019

The taxonomy from the rank of class and below is based upon currently published taxonomic opinion. For a complete taxonomy, refer to The Taxonomic Outline of Bacteria and Archaea, Release 7.7.
Citation
When referring to this Abstract, please use its Digital Object Identifier.
Taxon Abstract for the genus Cutibacterium Scholz and Kilian 2016 emend. Dekio et al. 2019. Retrieved . https://doi.org/10.1601/tx.29156.
Source File
This information was last reviewed on April 27, 2021.

References

  1. Dekio I, Sakamoto M, Suzuki T, Yuki M, Kinoshita S, Murakami Y, Ohkuma M. Cutibacterium modestum sp. nov., isolated from meibum of human meibomian glands, and emended descriptions of Cutibacterium granulosum and Cutibacterium namnetense. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2020; 70:2457-2462. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.004058 [PubMed].
  2. Scholz CFP, Kilian M. The natural history of cutaneous propionibacteria and reclassification of selected species within the genus Propionibacterium to the proposed novel genera Acidipropionibacterium gen. nov., Cutibacterium gen. nov. and Pseudopropionibacterium gen. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016; 66:4422-4432. https://doi.org/10.1099/ijsem.0.001367 [PubMed].
  3. Nouioui I, Carro L, García-López M, Meier-Kolthoff JP, Woyke T, Kyrpides NC, Pukall R, Klenk H-P, Goodfellow M, Göker M. Genome-Based Taxonomic Classification of the Phylum Actinobacteria. Front. Microbio. 2018; 9:2007-2007. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02007 [PubMed].
  4. Wylensek D, Hitch TCA, Riedel T, Afrizal A, Kumar N, Wortmann E, Liu T, Devendran S, Lesker TR, Hernández SB, Heine V, Buhl EM, M D'Agostino P, Cumbo F, Fischöder T, Wyschkon M, Looft T, Parreira VR, Abt B, Doden HL, Ly L, Alves JMP, Reichlin M, Flisikowski K, Suarez LN, Neumann AP, Suen G, de Wouters T, Rohn S, Lagkouvardos I, Allen-Vercoe E, Spröer C, Bunk B, Taverne-Thiele AJ, Giesbers M, Wells JM, Neuhaus K, Schnieke A, Cava F, Segata N, Elling L, Strowig T, Ridlon JM, Gulder TAM, Overmann J, Clavel T. A collection of bacterial isolates from the pig intestine reveals functional and taxonomic diversity. Nat Commun 2020; 11:6389-6389. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19929-w [PubMed].